Radical Agenda S05E083 – Impeachment Cohencidences

Our good friends at SaidTheJew.com picked up on a fun theme running through various openly Jewish publications.

If you’ve been keeping up with the Trump impeachment scam, you probably assumed Jews were behind it, just from the volume of lies and hysteria.

Then there’s the fact that the guy most prominently perpetrating the fraud, is Adam Schiff, the Jewish chairman of the House Intelligence Committee.

That is hardly the end of the list, as it turns out. Like anything terrible going on in government these days, Jewish involvement in the impeachment sham is pretty pervasive.

Spotting the Jew can be a difficult task sometimes. They often dress like goyim, especially when they are trying to trick us. They have been known to get nose jobs. They even say things like “my fellow White people” just to keep their cover.

If you “name the Jew”, somebody is probably going to call you a Nazi.

That is, unless you are a Jew. Then it’s not anti-Semitic. It’s just bragging.

That is why we here at SaidTheJew.com, love to read publications like the Forward. It’s just like reading Nazi propaganda, but without the risk of losing your job if you get caught.

Jews Behind Trump Impeachment

Jews Behind Trump Impeachment

Ari Feldman at Forward.com was kind enough to put together a helpful infographic, identifying some of the most prominent players as having Jewish ancestry.

“It’s time to ask the question we’ve all been wondering about” writes Ari, “Namely, which of these impeachment characters is Jewish?”

Feldman is careful to assure his readers that this is not some kind of Jewish conspiracy. It’s just that since Jews have taken over the governments of once White countries, “Where there’s smoke, there’s lox.

Now, we don’t present the following flow chart as evidence that there is some deep, dark Jewish secret at the center of the impeachment inquiry. So far, impeachment has (thankfully) little, if anything, to do with Israel, and the Jews at its center aren’t there because of their ties to major Jewish organizations.

Still, as in many political scandals of America’s recent history, now that Jews have successfully accessed the once-WASPy upper echelons of the federal government, we can say with certainty: “Where there’s smoke, there’s lox.”

Yonat Shimron at Religion News also chimed in on the subject. In a piece titled “Why are so many players in the impeachment trial Jewish?“, Yonat answers her own question in typical Jewish fashion. “Scholars say it’s mostly a coincidence, and there’s certainly no connection between them”

Cohencidence, indeed…

Jew Adam Schiff Speaking at the Council on Foreign Relations

Jew Adam Schiff Speaking at the Council on Foreign Relations

First on Feldman’s Jew List is, unsurprisingly, Adam Schiff. Feldman notes, by linking to a piece from the Jewish Telegraphic Agency, that this subversive activity has earned the House Intelligence Chair the nickname “Shifty Schiff”, which is considered an “anti-Semitic dog whistle.”

Trump said of Schiff: “We don’t call him ‘Shifty Schiff’ for nothing. He’s a shifty, dishonest guy.”

New York Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez accused the President of anti-Semitism for this.

“Understand that Trump is engaged in deliberate, atrocious, targeted antisemitism towards Chairman Schiff,” Ocasio-Cortez tweeted with a retweet of an article in The Intercept suggesting that Trump’s attacks against Schiff come from the neo-Nazi playbook.

The Intercept notes that calling Jews shifty – suggesting that they are sneaky and manipulative, is an age-old anti-Semitic canard.

In a tweet last week lambasting “Democratic savages,” President Donald Trump singled out two Jewish congressmen – Rep. Jerry Nadler of New York, Rep. Adam Schiff of California – and the quartet of congresswomen including Ocasio-Cortez known as The Squad. Nadler is head of the House Judiciary Committee.

Trump’s son, Donald Jr., in a tweet said that Schiff was “hand-picked and supported by George Soros,” and called him a Soros “puppet.”

Of course, it could also be the case that Schiff is being called “Shifty” because he actually is a liar. Even the Washington Post’s “Fact Checker” column hit the California Democrat with “four Pinocchios“, for falsely claiming that his panel had “not spoken directly” with the partisan CIA officer behind a so-called “whistleblower” complaint about President Donald Trump.

Unless you think Schiff’s decidedly “Shifty” behavior is an immutable characteristic of being an ethnic Jew, it would seem a stretch to accuse people of anti-Semitism for pointing it out. Then again, his Shifty behavior probably is genetic in its origins, so, as is often the case, the truth becomes “hate speech”.

Though Feldman’s “no dark Jewish conspiracy here, goy” disclaimer, claims that the Jews trying to overthrow the President, are not doing so “because of their ties to major Jewish organizations”, they certainly have ties to such organizations. STJ leaves it to the reader, to determine how much of a role this plays in their subversive activity.

Schiff is pictured above speaking at the Council on Foreign Relations, an organization which polite people might describe as “globalist”. Of course, “globalist” is another anti-Semitic dog whistle, according to our friends at Haaretz, and as of 2016, at least 33% of the CFR Board of Directors were Jewish.

He has also been a featured speaker at the American Israel Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC) convention as recently as 2018, and has ties to the Anti-Defamation league going back to at least 2013.

Next up is Eliot Engel, Chair of the House Foreign Affairs Committee, and descendant of Ukrainian Jews.

Like Schiff, Engel celebrates his Jewish identity through participation in powerful Jewish organizations like AIPAC. He is pictured speaking several such events.

He is the founder and co-chair of the Bipartisan Taskforce for Combating Anti-Semitism, and the Congressional Israel Allies Caucus. Rep. Engel also serves as Chairman of the International Council for Jewish Parliamentarians. Since coming to Congress in 1989, Rep. Engel has been a champion for Israel, and the Jewish Diaspora community worldwide.

In a video produced for B’nai B’rith International, Engel said “Being Jewish to me is very, very important. It is who I am. It is what I am”. In the video, the congressman additionally discusses tikkun olam and his connection to the State of Israel, which he first visited in 1971.

Linking to another piece from the Jewish Telegraphic Agency, Feldman notes that Engel once refused to shake the President’s hand, over the Commander in Chief’s insufficient rapidity in caving to Jewish ethnic interests.

‘I’ve decided not to stand on the aisle of the House chamber to shake the president’s hand during this joint session of Congress, as I have done in the past through Democratic and Republican administrations alike,” the Jewish New York Democrat said.

“He’s rejected America’s traditional role welcoming refugees, which have helped to make our country great,” said Engel.

Jerry Nadler Displaying His True National Loyalty

Jerry Nadler Displaying His True National Loyalty

Jerry Nadler rounds out the top three. His position as chairman of the House Judiciary Committee has earned him plenty of time in front of the cameras since Dems took the House in 2018.

Feldman notes that Nadler was a member of a Jewish fraternity known as Alpha Epsilon Pi. He is also a world renowned “Talmud whiz” and is rumored to have resorted to disreputable means in search of pastrami.

Jewish Virtual Library celebrates Nadler’s long history of subversive activity in politics, dating as far back as 1977;

Nadler has been on the front lines in the fight for civil rights, and has been a relentless defender of our country’s fundamental promise of equality for all. He has been a leader in the fight to protect voting rights and reduce voter disenfranchisement. Nadler has also taken an active role in working against discriminatory racial profiling by law enforcement.

A Vice-Chair and founding member of the House Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual and Transgender (LGBT) Equality Caucus, Nadler has been an original co-sponsor of every major piece of LGBT civil rights legislation for the last twenty-plus years.

Nadler has played a significant role in the fight for women’s rights, serving as a central figure in the reauthorization of the Violence Against Women Act and the author of the Pregnant Workers Fairness Act. He is also a staunch defender of women’s health, including a woman’s constitutional right to access an abortion.

Jewesses Elaine Luria and Elissa Slotkin

Jewesses Elaine Luria and Elissa Slotkin

Next up are two first-term Congresswomen. Jewesses Elaine Luria and Elissa Slotkin, both gained their seats in the House when their districts flipped from red to blue in the 2018 midterm elections.

Elaine Luria began her infiltration of the United States Government at the young age of 17, when she joined the Navy. The Jewish Virtual Library says that “On her first day in uniform, she was inspired by the Naval Academy’s Mission, to assume the highest responsibilities of command, citizenship, and government.”

Luria served 20 years in the Navy, in part as a nuclear engineer. She retired in 2017, before concluding she could do more damage in Congress.

Elissa Slotkin’s involvement should come as no surprise. Jewish Virtual Library says that “Slotkin worked as a political analyst (2003-2004) and intelligence briefer (2004-2005) for the Central Intelligence Agency. From 2005 to 2006, she was a senior assistant on the staff of the Director of National Intelligence. She was the leader of a CIA assessment team in Iraq from 2006 to 2007, and the National Security Council staff’s director for Iraq policy from 2007 to 2009.”

Gordon Sondland with Jean-Claude Juncker, and Jared Kushner

Gordon Sondland with Jean-Claude Juncker, and Jared Kushner

Skipping over Jared Kushner, we come to Gordon Sondland. The son of German-Jewish “refugees”, Sondland has served as ambassador to the European Union since July of 2018.

During the 2016 United States presidential election, Sondland initially supported Donald Trump, but cancelled a fundraiser and repudiated Trump for his attacks on Democrat puppets, Khizr and Ghazala Khan. In April 2017, it was revealed that 4 companies registered to Sondland donated $1 million to the Donald Trump inaugural committee, which presumably helped to pave the way for his employment with the administration he had previously renounced.

This, as you may have heard, did not work out well for the President.

According to Sondland’s own testimony, Trump told him “I want nothing. I want no quid pro quo, … I want Zelensky to do the right thing.”

When U.S. special envoy to Ukraine, William Taylor, said to Sondland “I think it’s crazy to withhold security assistance for help with a political campaign,” Sondland replied “Bill, I believe you are incorrect about President Trump’s intentions. The president has been crystal clear: no quid pro quo’s of any kind. The president is trying to evaluate whether Ukraine is truly going to adopt the transparency and reforms that President Zelensky promised during the campaign. I suggest we stop the back and forth by text,”

Sondland then reversed himself. In “supplemental testimony” later submitted to House impeachment investigators, Sondland said “I now recall speaking individually with Mr. Yermak, where I said that resumption of U.S. aid would likely not occur until Ukraine provided the public anti-corruption statement that we had been discussing for many weeks”

Mr. Sondland’s lawyer Robert Luskin, also Jewish, spoke to the Wall Street Journal about his client’s “supplemental testimony”.

Lt. Col. Alexander Vindman is a Jewish "refugee"

Lt. Col. Alexander Vindman is a Jewish “refugee”

Lt. Col. Alexander Vindman is a Jewish “refugee” from Ukraine, and despite this obvious problem, was able to listen in on Trump’s call with President Zelensky of Ukraine. Vindman, who listened in on the conversation in his official capacity, would be the first whistleblower to have firsthand knowledge of the call.

“I did not think it was proper to demand that a foreign government investigate a US citizen, and I was worried about the implications for the US government’s support of Ukraine,” Vindman, an army officer and the top NSC official handling Ukraine, says in testimony posted by the New York Times.

John Eisenberg, top lawyer for the National Security Council, and Jay Sekulow, one of Trump’s personal attorneys, are also both Jewish, but have not yet stuck daggers in the President’s back. When that inevitably happens, we’ll be sure to update you.

Not all the Jews involved in the plot to overthrow the President are Americans.

Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky is a Jew himself, but so far his ethnic tendency to screw the goyim has not presented itself.

Lev Parnas and Igor Fruman are Ukrainian Jews whom Feldman describes as Giuliani’s “men in the Ukraine”. They were both recently arrested for allegedly violating campaign finance laws.

Marie Yovanovitch Pushing Faggotry in Ukraine

Marie Yovanovitch Pushing Faggotry in Ukraine

In the House impeachment hearing of November 15th 2019, former US Ambassador to Ukraine, Marie Yovanovitch, received a very humorous introduction from Adam Schiff. He said that Yovanovitch was born in Canada, to parents who had fled “the Soviet Union, and the Nazis”.

During her testimony, Trump tweeted “Everywhere Marie Yovanovitch went turned bad. She started off in Somalia, how did that go?”

Pretty good, according to the libertarians.

Mark Zaid Got His Coup

Mark Zaid Got His Coup

The attorney for the so called “Ukraine Whistleblower” is named Mark Zaid.

You might guess from looking at him, or by reading his Tweets, that Zaid is Jewish, too.

If you had any doubts remaining, you could watch this video by the National Museum of American Jewish Military History. In it, Zaid tells the story of his grandfather Rabbi David Max Eichhorn. Eichhorn was the Jewish chaplain who conducted the first religious services at Dachau after the liberation of the camp.

On Twitter, Zaid went further, stating that his grandfather “helped liberate” the camp, before giving the service. After the service, Zaid claims the Jews destroyed a swastika as “a deliberate poke in the eye to Hitler and the Nazis”.

Zaid served as editor for the book “The GI’s Rabbi: World War 2 Letters Of David Max Eichhorn”. In the book’s description, Eichorn is described as “a Jewish chaplain in the U.S. Army” who “saw action across France and into Germany until VE-Day and beyond. He was there at the Battle of the Bulge, participated in the liberation of Dachau, and became embroiled in the behind-the-scenes controversy that led to the execution of Private Eddie Slovik.”

Of course, this would mean Mr. Eichorn was a war criminal, since Chaplains are considered non combatants under the Geneva conventions.

“… chaplains, shall have the benefit of the same neutrality [as military hospitals and ambulances] when on duty, and while there remain any wounded to be brought in or assisted”

Acting as a combatant while enjoying such protections, could hardly be counted as the sort of heroism Zaid likes to associate with it. One supposes this type of “Shifty” thinking ought to be expected from a Jewish coup plotter.

 

There’s a lot more to get to, plus your calls at 323-9-AGENDA, that’s 323-924-3632

Join us, this and every Monday and Friday from 5-7pm US Eastern time, for another exciting episode of the Radical Agenda!

Follow Chris on Telegram or Parler or Minds. The Jews banned me from everything else.

Podcast RSS FeedSubscribe via Email

Today we will have live streaming video courtesy of JoshWhoTV. Subscribe to our JoshWho Channel here and watch live on JoshWhoTV.

You can listen live on the Radical Agendas Radio Network. Catch video on demand on our Bitchute channel!

Continue reading

Outlaw Conservative S01E039 – Seamless Dishonesty

It’s been an exciting three weeks in Clown World. Frightening, even.

Long time listeners will recall that I used to think people were crazy for doubting certain historical narratives. I used to think it would be impossible for so many people, to tell the same lies, for so long, and convince so many, so thoroughly. I had to rethink that theory, after I became the subject of a fake news story a couple of years ago.

Once you realize how spectacularly the news lies, it follows that news tends to eventually become history. If our history books are half as dishonest as our newspapers, then we really can’t claim to have any firm understanding of history at all.

No wonder we keep repeating it.

It will definitely be interesting to see how this plays out, going forward. We know the surveillance apparatus of the US government is quite expansive, and we can be just as certain that we don’t know every detail of it. Everyone carries a camera now. Homes and businesses have security cameras. Pictures, video, and audio can be transferred around the world in the blink of an eye. While the tech and media overlords can suppress information enough that only determined people can find it, these days they cannot really get rid of evidence nearly so easily, as they could in the mid 1900s. The news lies with such shocking consistency, that it really has to make you wonder what the history books will say about these times, but given the availability and durability of information in the current era, there is perhaps some glimmer of hope that the people of the future will be better informed about today, than we were of yesteryear.

Or maybe not.

The confidence some people seem to have in their deceptions leaves room for doubt.

A video was leaked of ABC News reporter Amy Robach, talking about how the network buried a story she was working on about about convicted sex offender, and billionaire blackmailer, Jeffrey Epstein. The network sat on the story for three years, during which Epstein was presumably adding new victims to his already impressive resume.

After Epstein was found dead in his jail cell, the first supposed suicide in 40 years at that facility, Robach vented her frustrations in a video which was later leaked to Project Veritas. “I’ve had the story for three years … we would not put it on the air,” Robach said. “It was unbelievable what we had, Clinton, we had everything.”

You might recall, there was a very tense presidential election going on three years ago, so you can probably understand why ABC would be hesitant to publish anything that might hurt Clinton’s chances. One might even be able to reconcile their failure to publish it after the election, but the fact that it took Project Veritas to tell us about this, after the guy had already been arrested, found dead, and plastered all over the news for weeks, that is really something.

ABC claims the story did not meet their high journalistic standards, which was humorous. This would seem to have been contradicted by that video of a Kentucky gun range, which they tried to pass off as Turks slaughtering civilians in Syria. This was offered as definitive proof of a catastrophic Trump foreign policy failure, until they got caught, and claimed it was some honest mistake. I won’t bother to harp on how they leapt at opportunities to publish unsubstantiated allegations against Trump and Brett Kavanaugh, because you’ve surely heard this a million times by now. I was too busy doing time in jail to see how recklessly they covered the Charlottesville incident, but I doubt their high journalistic standards were in place back then, either.

Having this cover up exposed does not seem to have raised their journalistic standards any. We have yet to see that story Amy Robach was working on, and a brand new cover up is underway, as the company frantically tries to find the employee who leaked the video.

CBS fired an employee of theirs who used to work at ABC, on the suspicion that she was the leaker. 25-year-old Emmy-award winning producer Ashley Bianco, sat down for an interview with Megyn Kelly after her firing. Bianco acknowledges having accessed the video, but denied being O’Keefe’s source.

O’Keefe subsequently stated in a Tweet that Bianco was not the source, and that the source is still employed with ABC. The source released a letter, which they signed as “Ignotus”, Latin for “unknown”, and also the name of a Harry Potter character. In that letter, the source claims “I sit right here with you all in complete shock on how this has been handled”, implying he or she is still with the company. Another ABC insider spoke to PageSix.com, claiming that ABC investigators have been searching staff emails and news logs, and interrogating staffers, trying to find the source of the leak.

Scant attention to the scandal has been paid by other news networks, save for Fox. To witness these companies, who are in theory supposed to be business competitors, all cooperating to cover up one of their sins, paints a startling picture of just how corrupt these institutions have become. Speaking as one with a pre-existing well earned healthy skepticism of the Press, even I found the brazenness of it all rather stunning. They have been caught. They know they have been caught. Yet, they refuse to acknowledge any wrongdoing, and remain engaged in a cover up effort, even as people watch them.

They show not the slightest bit of concern for their credibility in the eyes of the informed, and are attempting only to keep people from becoming informed.

Congress seems to have similar designs.

As I type this, I am watching the so called impeachment hearings on Fox News. After pre-screening the evidence and witnesses in secret for weeks, Adam Schiff is finally ready to present the information most favorable to his party in public view. He will not, however, allow most of the witnesses or information the Republicans have requested, because that is not favorable to his party.

House Democrats know that the Republican controlled Senate will surely uncover this information, and that the President will not be removed from power after that process.  This proceeding is a mere media spectacle.

So far, the two witnesses I’ve watched, spent most of their time discussing their own foreign policy views, and how they vary from those of the President. This of course, is completely irrelevant to whether or not the President committed a crime, but proving anything of that sort is clearly not the goal. The media will simply present these differences of opinion, as an act of treason by the President. When the Senate rejects this foolishness, the media may be expected to treat refutations of these theories, similarly to how they treated the Epstein story.

The media knows Congress is lying, and Congress is counting on the media’s willingness to deceive as well. Perhaps this should be unsurprising by this point, but recent media coverage of Michael Bloomberg’s potential entry into the Democrat presidential primary, has reveals an even more concerning angle.

Of particular interest, is the Left’s willingness to dismiss the information provided to them by their own media.

To some, this might seem like little more than an indicator that Democrats are quite not so stupid as we tend to think.

The media lies. Constantly.

One would have to be an idiot not to know this in the current year. Democrats might be late to the party in this regard, if only due to their own confirmation bias, but to see them come around on this topic, could be seen as a positive development.

In my mind, it seems frighteningly sinister.

To set the stage, let’s take a look at some polling.

To hear Trump tell it, this is just more “fake news”. He calls these “suppression polls”, and says they are designed to do little more than demoralize Republican voters. It’s all a giant conspiracy to make you stay home on election day, rather than to bother voting for a candidate with no hope of success.

Of course, Trump’s skepticism of the media is what makes him a threat to Democracy. This is an assault on the freedom of the press! Only Nazis distrust the media!

So, if you’re a Democrat, the 2020 election hardly seems worth thinking about, much less fearing, given such solid data from such reliable sources.

Biden will be the nominee, and he’ll beat Trump. Case closed. No need to panic.

Hell, Trump probably won’t even be President next November. If Rashida Tlaib has her way, Trump might not even be free man by that point.

Mike Pence never filled a stadium full of screaming fans, he would be easier to beat than Trump.

After 8 more years of subsidized mass immigration into the country, there won’t even be a Republican Party. Al

So, what in God’s name is Michael Bloomberg doing, entering the race? Why are Democrats in panic mode about losing the election? Why is Twitter refusing to run political advertisements? Why is Google censoring search results? Why are YouTube and Facebook censoring ever more moderate voices?

Why even bother with the impeachment inquiry? Why does Al Green think impeachment is the only way to prevent Trump’s re-election?

Clearly, the Democrats don’t buy their own BS. They know the polls are fake.

Worse still, they know that Trump has succeeded in exposing the media as a bunch of frauds. Since nobody trusts them anymore, these polls will fail to shape public opinion, just as badly as they have failed to measure it.

Some stand out as more ridiculous than others, so you can hardly blame people for being skeptical.

Most recently, the Washington Post and ABC have published a poll, in which even Kamala Harris beats Trump by 9 percent. This despite the fact that Harris has never polled above 6% in her own Party. Owing to this lack of support, she recently laid off most of her campaign staff throughout the country, to focus her dwindling resources on the Iowa caucuses. Unsurprisingly, she blamed her dismal performance on racism and misogyny, which are clearly major problems, amongst Democrat primary voters, nationwide.

All of this could be dismissed as amusing, in some sense. Trump supporters might spend the next 12 months just playing with their Democrat opponents, as a cat plays with a mouse. These people are so dishonest, that even they don’t know which way is up anymore.

We know the truth, we’ve got our candidate, and as the clock ticks life away, lies have a greater tendency to lose credibility, than to gain it.

I am somewhat less optimistic.

Democrats know the media is lying, as evidenced by the disconnect between what the media says, and what the Party does. The politicians and money masters are frantically trying to prevent Trump from even being a candidate in 2020, while the power brokers are in a desperate search for a credible candidate, who yet remains stubbornly elusive.

This is not lost on average Democrat voters, who seem to spend every waking moment terrified of Trump’s second, third, and 13th terms as President. Despite their media bombarding them with contrary data, they seem convinced, not only of Trump’s electability, but of his capacity to defy death itself, and rule the country with an iron fist, well after his hundredth birthday has come and gone.

This fear leads them to ignore, if not endorse, political violence by masked anarchists, who want to abolish the same government these people think should control every aspect of the human condition. They have made venerable heroes of drug addicts and sexual deviants, who attack senior citizens, set limousines on fire, and smash the windows out of their favorite banks and coffee shops. To them, the uncertainty of mass political violence perpetrated by crazy people, is better than the certainty of losing the 2020 election.

If they believed the polls, this would terrify them. They would see nutcases idiots as a threat to their otherwise certain electoral victory, and demand they be crushed by any means necessary. They are tolerating, and even celebrating this madness, all because they know, deep down, that the media is completely full of crap.

The scary part is, they don’t seem to mind.

We know the media is full of crap too, and we say so all the time. For us, to say that the media lies, is like saying that the sky is blue. For the Left, to say that the media lies is like going to Saudi Arabia with a hat made of bacon, and saying that Mohammad was a Jewish pederast, while wiping your behind with ripped up pages of the Koran.

We would far prefer the media to be honest. We do not call the media dishonest because we hate journalism. We hate journalists because they are dishonest.

Like everything else in their bizarro world, it is pretty much the exact opposite for the Left. If the media was honest, they would hate them. That’s why they love social media censorship and call for “hate speech” to be banned. Truth is treason, in this empire of lies. The siren song of Maddow et al, is like fentanyl to them. They love being lied to, but to acknowledge the deception would be to tell the truth, and this is forbidden. Thou shalt not commit blasphemy in the presence of the faithful, lest ye be burned at the stake as a heretic.

The dishonesty is not just something they tolerate as some ugly necessity of the power struggle. Even to call it an “article of faith” and sum it up as the doctrine of a bizarre fundamentalist religion, fails to capture the full horrifying scope, because their actions are evidence that they are acting not on belief, but disbelief.

They don’t believe their own lies, but they repeat them anyway, as they go on behaving like people who know the truth.

They have fully internalized dishonesty as a way of life, on a civilizational scale.

Think about it like this. No serious person believes in transgenderism. The reason one says that they support transgender equality, is to show others that they are in on the scam. Transgenderism is an extreme example, but it was the natural progression from other outrageous lies, which were normalized over the course of decades.

It used to be that saying one believed in racial equality would accomplish the same goal. People knew this was insane back then, and to say you held this bizarre belief meant you were part of a group. It was like a secret code word, or symbolic hand gesture. It meant that you could be counted on to take part in other deceptions, without ever discussing the details or acknowledging the dishonesty of the deed.

Eventually, the coercive power of the group caused everyone else to repeat the same lie. Once that happened, one risked dealing with honest people who could not be counted on, if they relied only on this cryptic signal. So, they came up with new, and increasingly bizarre, ways of showing their loyalty to, and rank in, the conspiracy.

Hunter Biden’s tenure at Burisma provides a fine example of this, and Trump’s “no quid pro quo” phone call with the Ukrainian President, provides a telling contrast.

Setting aside Joe Biden’s demand to fire the prosecutor, for the moment, most of that scheme, however obviously corrupt, never actually required an illegal act. Nobody ever had to say “Hunter, we would like to hire you for our corrupt energy company. We will give you insane amounts of money for a job you are so clearly unqualified to do, and all we ask in return is that your father do us favors in Washington”.

I obviously have no idea what was discussed, but I can easily imagine that they never once discussed a corrupt act. They just offered him this great job that paid him really well, and strangely never asked him for anything. They didn’t have to ask, he just knew that nobody gets free money, and something would be expected of him. The unspoken, but nonetheless universally understood arrangement, was that somebody would mention a problem in the presence of Hunter Biden, and Hunter Biden would mention this in casual conversation with his father. Without ever offering to solve the problem, or even asking how he could help, Joe Biden would then have a spontaneous epiphany about some aspect of American foreign policy, and direct things in a way favorable to Burisma.

Savvy operators on the world stage pick up on stuff like this. Just by showing others they might deal with that they were connected to Biden, other gates of opportunity would swing open, on the mere assumption that the opportunity for corrupt gains might walk on through them.

Peter Schweizer and Jacob McLeod outlined some troubling details about Hunter Biden’s fantastic success in China, for example.

While the Ukraine story is getting the most news coverage, Biden’s China adventure actually preceded Ukraine and Burisma. For no discernible reason a Chinese “private” equity firm with close ties to the ruling Communist Party and state run enterprises, paraded Hunter Biden around as the big dawg of their $1.5 billion investment fund. This was itself preceded by a conspicuously rapid advancement through the ranks at Delaware bank MBNA, where he was hired fresh out of law school, and quickly became Senior Vice President of the company in less than two years. At the same time, he was working as a lobbyist for various interest groups, including those in the pharmaceutical and online gambling industries.

Not bad for a guy who got kicked out of the Navy for using drugs, eh?

Now, maybe there was a smoky back room deal where everybody hashed out the details. This is certainly possible, but it was also unnecessary.

Hunter Biden is a screw upwho couldn’t accomplish any of these things without political connections. There is no sign that he ever actually “accomplished” anything at all, he was just handed these incredible “jobs” which offered him wealth most people could never imagine. Other corrupt actors saw him “accomplishing” these things anyway, and they saw the companies he worked for getting what they wanted. So, they paid Hunter too, and as luck would have it, things started working out really well for them, in similar fashion.

On the Right, we don’t have this kind of power. We tend to view our integrity as one of the most important defining characteristics of our identity. When our people lie, or even when things give the appearance of potential impropriety, our own people descend upon the corruption like an autoimmune response.

Even when we attempt to act in a corrupt way, our habits formed in the course of honest dealings, tend to disadvantage us against our more habitually deceptive opponents. Let us take the facts we’ve been delivered about the impeachment inquiry at face value, to draw the point.

The Trump administration temporarily withheld military aid to Ukraine. A month before the Ukrainians even knew about this, Trump had a phone call with Zelensky, and mentioned Biden and Crowd Strike in vague terms of a broader corruption problem. The theory of the latest impeachment scheme, is that Trump intended to use this military aid as leverage, to get a Ukrainian investigation opened up into Joe Biden, so as to gain political advantage stateside.

Now, I think this was actually a pretty good idea. I would think it was a pretty good idea, even if it was a corrupt act, but since Biden was obviously acting corruptly in Ukraine and around the world, this was nothing of the sort. The President is constitutionally obligated to faithfully execute the laws of the United States. Negotiating with foreign leaders to prosecute criminals, is a perfectly reasonable thing for a President to do. People do not get a license to break the law, just by running for President, and conducting corrupt business in a foreign jurisdiction.

Yet, Trump specifically said to Ambassador Gordon Sondland, “I want nothing. I want no quid pro quo. I want Zelensky to do the right thing.”

This seems to indicate some awareness that, even though direct transactional exchanges are perfectly normal in foreign policy, this one would not be well received as such. He would instead carry this out through the power of suggestion, by mentioning this problem that he wanted solved one day, and on another day, the man he discussed it with would find himself waiting longer than expected for a large payment. Trump seemed to hope Zelenski would take the hint, and presumably, Trump’s Ukraine policy would become conspicuously friendly, once Biden was exposed for a crook.

Unfortunately for Trump, he found himself with a problem all too familiar to Right wingers. The deadly combination of honest friends, and dishonest enemies, with the added hazard of uncertainty as to who fell into what camp.

Trump seemed to be trying to establish a trusted channel of communication with the Ukrainians, using Rudy Giuliani as the conduit. Trump supposedly directed Secretary of Energy Rick Perry, and two top State Department officials, to deal Giuliani when Zelenski sought to meet Trump. “If they can satisfy Rudy, they can satisfy the President,” a source familiar with the meeting told CNN.

Giuliani does not have an official position within the administration, serving instead as Trump’s personal attorney. The suspicion, which I must reluctantly admit is reasonable, was that he did this in the hope of using attorney client privilege, to maintain secrecy about whatever arrangements were made.

Going outside the normal diplomatic channels raised red flags within the administration. The effort to establish a secure conduit of information through privileged communications with Giuliani, exacerbated suspicions, and seems to indicate an effort to do more than make suggestions, and hope for the best.

None of this is anywhere near as messed up as Hunter ‘the Cocaine Hoover’ Biden becoming fabulously wealthy without lifting a finger, but since Republicans are not nearly so totally immersed in habitual corruption as our Democrat counterparts, it looks far more out of place.

Take any infinite number of examples. If you watch Fox News, you will hear “imagine if a Republican did this!” a dozen times a day, during a slow news week, as the hosts continue in seeming perpetuity, to feign confusion over Democrat hypocrisy.

  • The #MeToo fervor by the same people who covered for Harvey Weinstein, and Jeffrey Epstein.
  • The sudden reverence for the United States Constitution under Trump, by the top proponents of Obamacare and Gay Marriage.
  • The domestic hawkishness over White Supremacist terrorism, by the same open borders fanatics who call you a racist for blocking immigration from Muslim countries we are currently at war with.
  • The concern trolling over Trump’s “hateful, divisive rhetoric” by the people who call rioting anarchists “a courageous group of Americans”.
  • Trump calling CNN “fake news” is an attack on our First Amendment, while corporate censorship of Right wingers is the singular component of the “free market” in which property rights remain sacred, and inviolable.

But hypocrisy fails to capture the full horrifying scope of it. In all reality, to dismiss it as such, is to provide cover for the most evil forces imaginable. These people definitely are not doing this out of mere stupidity, either, and to say so is to provide similar cover for the same wickedness. It is a profoundly complex cognitive burden to lie so frequently. No fool, genius, nor model of mediocrity, could accidentally do anything, with such remarkable consistency, as the reliable pattern of Leftist deception.

The world we live in today, and its most sacred, unquestioned narratives, have been constructed with care, precision, dedication, and persistence. If these talents were put to more noble uses, they would be nothing short of awe inspiring. The willingness of the public to be lied to, and to go along with the lies themselves, while knowing the falsehood of the narratives, and the duplicity of the sources, paints an even more frightening picture.

We are literally surrounded by liars.

 

Join us, this and every Wednesday from 5-7pm US Eastern time for another exciting episode of the Outlaw Conservative Podcast, where I look forward to hearing from you at 808-4-OUTLAW, or on our Discord Server at https://OutlawConservative.com/discord

On another note, have you tried the Brave Browser?

Follow Chris on TelegramParlerMinds – Podcast RSS FeedSubscribe via Email

Today we will have live streaming video courtesy of JoshWhoTV. Subscribe to our JoshWho Channel here and watch live on JoshWhoTV.

You can listen live on the Radical Agendas Radio Network. Catch video on demand on our Bitchute channel!

Continue reading

Radical Agenda S05E082 – Adam Kokesh

In the book I am working on, the description of how I shifted from libertarianism to White Nationalism was a long, gradual process, which I cover in considerable detail.

Those of you who have been with me for a long time, will find it unsurprising that the name Adam Kokesh came up several times in telling that tale.

Adam and I ran for the United States House of Representatives at the same time in 2010. Adam’s campaign was considerably more successful than mine, in that although neither of us have ever sponsored a major piece of legislation, Adam at least made the ballot. He had obtained the coveted endorsement of Dr. Ron Paul, which was a big boost to the already substantial reputation he had built for himself, as an activist with a group called Iraq Veterans Against the War.

In the nine years since then, Adam and I have had a pretty interesting relationship. His YouTube notoriety was a large part of my inspiration for becoming a content producer. At times, the casual observer might have thought we were best friends, and at others, mortal enemies. We have taken shots at eachother in our content and on social media, then gone right back to collaborating on content together, as if none of those things had ever happened. When I thought he had earned criticism, I was not at all hesitant to provide it, and when I thought he was being attacked unfairly, I came to his defense.

Most recently, Adam and I were invited to debate one another back in January of 2017, at a live event hosted by the Rothbardian Circle in Miami. We tackled the subject of immigration, and the broader merits of diversity. Whatever one’s view of things, all seemed to agree it made for an entertaining and thought provoking exchange.

Given Adam’s Jewish ancestry, it is perhaps no surprise that we have grown more distant since I was plastered all over the news as a famous Nazi.

We have not completely lost contact, however.

I have remained subscribed to his email list, and it is one of few newsletters that I still read. Having had him in my phone’s contacts the entire time, I realized he was also my Telegram contact after I became a frequent user of that application. So, occasionally, we shoot eachother a message via that medium, when one of us comes across the other’s radar.

Adam was fresh in my mind from my work on the book, when I saw this Rasmussen Poll titled “Surprising Number Say Third-Party Presidential Vote Likely in 2020“.

The latest Rasmussen Reports national telephone and online survey finds that 38% of Likely U.S. Voters say they are likely to vote for someone other than President Trump or the Democratic presidential nominee in next year’s election. That includes 22% who are Very Likely to do so.

Adam is currently seeking the Libertarian Party’s nomination for President of the United States in next year’s all important election. He is calling for an “orderly dissolution” of the United States Federal Government, and calls his campaign the “American Referendum”. Though I remain reluctant to endorse his candidacy, for obvious, and not so obvious reasons, I find some aspects of what he says to be quite appealing.

In the somewhat unlikely event that he were to succeed in this effort, Adam’s plan would not impose anarchy throughout the continent of North America. As I understand it, his program would, essentially, leave it to the individual state and local governments to chart their own course for the future. If California wants to have open borders and a generous welfare state, they can destroy themselves in this fashion without dragging New Hampshire down with them. If one geographic region wanted to band together as a federation of all White ethnostates, President Kokesh would not send troops to stop them. If one region wanted to adopt high tech direct democracy, and another instead chose a hereditary monarchy, neither would meet opposition from the Kokesh administration, save for perhaps some verbal or written criticism.

As a purely political matter, Trump supporters might stand to benefit from Adam obtaining the Libertarian Party’s nomination.

The conventional thinking, is that Libertarian candidates deprive Republicans of votes which would otherwise have gone their way, if not for the Libertarian’s presence on the ballot. Issues like taxes, regulation, and gun rights, are largely shared between the two parties, and since Libertarians are more concerned with ideas than political power, they can afford to take firmer positions on such issues than their Republican counterparts. This makes Libertarians an appealing “protest vote” for hard line single issue voters of the Right.

We are fortunate to live in times when conventional thinking does a poor job of predicting the future, however.

Firstly, one doubts many prior Trump supporters would defect to support Adam.

The nationalist fervor stirred by Trump, hardly leaves GOP voters anxious to break up the Union. While many Republicans might consider the dissolution of the federal government a fine alternative to Democrat rule, they also know that Democrat rule would be the far more likely outcome, of widespread defections from the GOP. Anyone who voted for Trump would likely perceive Adam’s message as being far to the Left of their liking, and Trump’s warnings of “Radical Democrats” trying to destroy the country, would only be confirmed by Adam’s proposal to do so formally.

In fact, Kokesh might well end up pulling more votes, from the Left. He has even earned the endorsement of notorious figures on the Left, including the infamous Cynthia McKinney.

Adam’s Left leaning tone would be far more appealing to Left wing extremists, than anyone Right of center. The Left’s total and perpetual panic over the Trump presidency, should have a substantial number of them rethinking their comfort level, with allowing the federal government to control every aspect of the human condition. They are certainly long overdue for a reminder on the merits of federalism, and the prospect of Trump’s second term could make dissolving the union seem appealing by comparison, especially given how seriously they seem to take his jokes about staying in power indefinitely.

Joe Biden is rapidly losing support among Democrat primary voters, despite all the fake polling designed to make him look like a serious candidate. This leaves Elizabeth Warren the apparent front runner for the Democratic nomination, but her insane economic ideas are quickly polarizing our financial oligarchs, who are in no way fooled by her fuzzy math. Her years of defrauding the Affirmative Action racket with the fake feather headdress, cannot help to endear her to the “Woke” wing of the Party, and with just three months to go until the Iowa caucuses, the power brokers are in full on panic mode, seeking an alternative to take on Trump.

This disarray has prompted Mike Bloomberg, the former mayor of New York City, to contemplate re-entering the race. He filed the requisite papers to run, just before the first deadline in Alabama, on Friday. Bloomberg has said he would spend $100,000,000 of his own money on a presidential bid, and a war chest like that could make James Fields a formidable opponent.

Now, you and I know better, of course, but to the average social justice warrior, Mike Bloomberg is one of those “old White men” they hate so much, and he is terribly unlikely to run on a platform of “Jews are not White”. His incredible wealth is the symbol of everything a communist hates, and his attempt to buy the election would leave any hard line Leftist ideologue, looking for a suitable “protest vote”. Such fears drove Hillary Clinton to call Tulsi Gabbard and Jill Stein “Russian Assets”, out of concern that they might seek to run as independent or third party candidates.

Given Adam’s prior employment with the Russia Today (RT) TV news channel, this would be sure to spawn infinite conspiracy theories, and hilarious Leftist hand-wringing.

Then there is the impact on Libertarian Party politics, which, though not of obvious importance to electoral outcomes, do impact the fringes of political discourse, and with that, the Overton Window.

Justin Amash defected from the GOP this year, in a pathetic attempt to stand out as a principled opposition to Trumpism. Given his libertarian roots, many have speculated this was in preparation to seek the Libertarian Party’s nomination to run against Trump in 2020, and Amash has expressed an interest in doing so.

Whoever wins the LP nomination, it cannot be Justin Amash. He must have his political career completely destroyed by this subversive activity, and be forced to fade into total humiliating obscurity, serving only as a warning to others.

John McAfee created a crappy anti-virus program back before there was such a thing as the Internet. He subsequently became a cryptocurency celebrity by investing some portion of the money he made from this into Bitcoin, before most people had heard of it. This combined with his choice to marry a black prostitute, has made him a very popular figure in libertarian circles.

He seems unlikely to win the nod however, since at the 2016 convention, he told the almost entirely White male audience, that they “should be ashamed” of themselves for their skin color and genitalia. While it may be helpful to our cause that we see White men flee the LP in favor Pinochetan Helicopterism, McAfee must be made to pay a steep political cost for this attack on the master demographic.

Vermin Supreme has announced his candidacy. Although he is a talented actor, well known for his creative stunts, his policy credentials render him fundamentally unserious as a candidate. He will have zero impact on the political discourse, even within the LP, and will only serve to solidify their reputation as a political joke.

Arvin Vohra has taken an admirable stance against political correctness. He even went so far as to be a guest on the Radical Agenda, during Stage 3 of the pogrom. If I was trying to salvage the Libertarian Party, Arvin might have my support in doing so. Unfortunately for him, I have no such designs.

The Left’s successful efforts to hijack the libertarian movement, and with it, the Libertarian Party, likely constituted the largest single factor in the rise of the Alt Right. While it was painful to watch them destroy this thing I once cared so deeply for, I am now quite happy to see Leftists further infected with impotent libertarian ideas. The further Left the LP drifts, the less impact they will have on Republican electoral victories, and the more they will deprive the Democrats of ideologically driven activists.

Perhaps most importantly, a rivalry between the Libertarian and Green Parties, to see who can win over a greater percentage of the transgender vote, will make for ceaseless amusement, and at the end of the day, what good is politics without an opportunity to ridicule the mentally ill?

I have not made myself intimately familiar with the other possible Libertarian candidates, but I will operate on the safe assumption that they are all Left wing, and that they all hate Trump.

So, which Left winger shall it be?

I think we could do a lot worse than Kokesh. He has a broad base of existing support. He has talent as a showman, and has shown an extraordinary willingness to take risks. These characteristics will be necessary for the Party’s nominee to draw attention to himself, during an election that is sure to be one of the most watched in recent history.

And of course, the Nazis can point to his platform and say “See? I told you the Jews were trying to bring down the government!”

Again, this is not a formal endorsement. Just a fun thing to think about, and of course, quality audio entertainment, when Adam joins me on the pogrom as my guest. This coming Monday, November 11th, at 5:00pm US Eastern time.

Don’t miss it!

Find out more about Adam’s campaign at KokeshForPresident.com

There’s a lot more to get to, plus your calls at 323-9-AGENDA, that’s 323-924-3632

Join us, this and every Monday and Friday from 5-7pm US Eastern time, for another exciting episode of the Radical Agenda!

Follow Chris on Telegram or Parler or Minds. The Jews banned me from everything else.

Podcast RSS FeedSubscribe via Email

Today we will have live streaming video courtesy of JoshWhoTV. Subscribe to our JoshWho Channel here and watch live on JoshWhoTV.

You can listen live on the Radical Agendas Radio Network. Catch video on demand on our Bitchute channel!

Continue reading

Radical Agenda S05E081 – Cured

Last we spoke I told you I had to punch out for a little while and work on some things. That was two weeks ago, and I am happy to report that things are coming along quite well.

I’m going to tell you about the progress of those things in a second, but first I’ll tell you what I am releasing today.

On March 26th 2016, I released a post titled Donald Trump Cured My Addiction. If you have payed close attention to me in the three and half years since, you know that “cure” was probably the wrong word, but I’ve been a drinker for a long time, and at the time I wrote this I had three months with no alcohol. This was in large part inspired by, maybe not Trump directly, but things that were going on which were in some ways influenced by the Trump campaign.

I used the boldest language possible to bring attention to the point I was trying to make, and this worked well, as I was contacted by a guy named Ben Wofford from Politico, who wanted to do a story about precisely this phenomenon.

I had planned on releasing the audio of this interview some time back, but let’s just say some things transpired which left me not in a position to brag about my sobriety. Today, I do not want to get back into the routine of counting days, but suffice it to say, I feel like I am in a place where I can publish this now, and that is the meat of the audio you are about to listen to.

As far as the stuff I have been working on, here is a bit of a progress report.

Two of the things I mentioned that I had to work on, were the civil suit in which I am now a pro se defendant, and a book which I have been meaning to publish for some time.

My response in the civil suit is pretty much complete, I am just checking it over and over again before I submit it to the court, constantly second guessing myself “Is this too much? Is this not enough?” you have to get it right the first time with these things, and that creates a lot of pressure, but I am working through it. There is also a motion I am preparing, which I have been consulting with a few trusted advisors on, and I hope very much for this to improve my situation in this giant burden which is weighing heavily upon me right now, and has been for over two years.

As I said last time, though, there are reasons to view this positively.

I recently found out that Albemarle County Commonwealth’s Attorney Robert Tracci has been running TV ads for his reelection, bragging about how he prosecuted me, but did not allow his office to become politicized by caving to demands for prosecuting others. HAHAHA! Oh boy, is that fucking prick lucky that I’m broke. The image he used of me, notably, was not of me doing what I had been accused of, because of course, no such image exists. Instead, he has a picture of me, being treated by a police officer, for the pepper spray I had sustained after those fucking animals attacked us.

He neglected to mention that he another guy on trial for assault, and lost.
He neglected to mention that he put Kessler on trial for perjury, and lost.
He neglected to mention that I’m home doing my thing, because he pleaded me out, knowing he was more than likely going to lose at trial in my case too.

But facing 40 years in prison, knowing that prick would lie and cheat and conspire with criminal anarchists to save face, I wasn’t risking that trial.

Well, now is my chance to risk trial. I cannot wait to go over all of this evidence in court, it is going to be spectacular, but a lot of work has to go into that, and until our movement figures out how to use cryptocurrency and spot subversives, I cannot hire someone else to do it for me, so I have to do that work myself.

As far as the book goes, I have over 400 pages compiled, that is, in Microsoft Word with so-called “Normal” margins on 8 1/2 x 11 paper with and 11 point font. When the book is actually published, it will likely be on smaller paper with thinner margins, and maybe a smaller font, but that’s the reference point I’m working with in any case. This includes more than 200 pages of original writing I have put together in just the last month, and I have been pasting blog posts and transcribing old videos throughout, to tell the story, and touch on a lot of really important issues.

By the time I am done compiling this, it’s probably going to be close to 7 or 8 hundred pages, and then I am going to have a sizable editing task on my hands to whittle it down to something more manageable for print, but there will likely be several e-book versions, including an unabridged version for those who want every last gory detail.

Writing this book has been difficult for me, yet therapeutic at the same time. I have to reopen a lot of old wounds and relive some traumatizing stuff, and the toughest parts are actually yet to come. Once I get all the way through the timeline, I have to go back through it again, elaborate on some points, change some names to protect the innocent, and of course, the guilty, and relive all this stuff all over again.

It is an intellectual challenge as well, because I am going through a lot of my old libertarian writing, which I had convinced myself over the last year was more or less worthless. It isn’t. Some of it is cringe inducing, sure. Some of it is misguided, obviously, but there is a reason that I became a top libertarian blogger. I was very good at what I did, and I knew what I was talking about.

As I started shifting rightward ideologically, I was out of my depth, initially. I think some of the worst stuff I wrote was actually when I was trying to reconcile what I believed for all those years, with the way my views were changing. Most notably, when I started figuring out that Black Lives Matter was a major problem, and I tried to reconscile this with all the anti-cop stuff I had said in the years leading up to that phenomenon. That was really difficult for me, and it came across in my writing.

I could go on about this at length, but I’ll stop here for the sake of time, and get to the Addiction material I have planned for you right after I beg for some money.

Please, please, please, pay me if you can. I was not making enough money when I announced this break, and taking time off has not improved my finances, but this book is going to be GREAT, I promise, and it is really important for this story to get told. It will probably never see the distribution it deserves, but I do have reason to believe it will bring with it a much needed cash injection once it’s done, and influence a significant number of opinions. So, I have to put as much effort into it as I can. While that is going on, I need your support to get me through this time.

Send me a check for over $100 if you can, please

Christopher Cantwell
63 Emerald Street, Unit 187
Keene NH 03431

If a hundred people sent me $100 I would have ten grand, and that would be fucking huge, you don’t even know. This thing has been carried for months by a handful of generous people, and some badly neglected Outlaw Conservative paywall members, of which you can be counted for just ten bucks a month, at OutlawConservative.com/join.

Cryptocurrency, of course, at ChristopherCantwell.com/donate and, without further ado, lemme tell you how Donald Trump cured my addiction, so to speak.

Radical Agenda S05E080 – Powering Up

If you’ve been listening to the Radical Agenda or Outlaw Conservative podcasts, you have likely heard by now that I have been planning to take a few weeks off from the live shows. There are a number of reasons for this, some of which I can tell you about, and some of which I cannot. Those of you who have been with me through other moments when I needed some time off, have noted that when I came back from such breaks, I’ve come back stronger than ever.

I assure you, this will be no exception.

For the last few months, I’ve been taking a day off here and there to put out fires, and to invest time, effort, and resources, into some of the things I cannot talk about. Those investments have not yet paid off, and in the process I have spread myself way too thin. As a result, I have not tended to my own needs. This has impaired my ability to concentrate, and the challenges which I must focus on to prevail over, have snowballed to a point where I can no longer ignore them.

When speaking about this on air, I have mentioned a book I am working on. Actually, there is more than one book in the works. I am going to talk about that before the end of this post, but this is not the real reason I am taking the time off. If I did not have other demands on my attention, I could obviously work on these projects during the days I am not doing the shows.

Legal Matters

The most pressing concern before me right now is the lawsuit in which I am a defendant, stemming from the events of August of 2017, in Charlottesville, Virginia. The Unite the Right rally was a pivotal moment in American history, and though most people consider the matter quite settled, that battle in fact continues, in a federal court in the Western District of Virginia.

I would far prefer not to have this burden upon my shoulders, but in a certain sense, we should be grateful for this litigation. The public consciousness is saturated with media lies about the events of that weekend, and this lawsuit presents the first real opportunity we’ve had to expose the truth. This fact, I suspect, has much to do with the anonymous accounts which have been attacking me online. I have reason to suspect they have been hired by the Plaintiffs’ counsel, or are at least sympathetic to their goals. They are attacking my reputation, my ability to make money, and the few remaining platforms I have, from which I can be heard and earn money pay my bills, in part to diminish my ability to defend myself in this lawsuit.

So far, most of the legal proceedings regarding Unite the Right have been in criminal court. The life or death circumstances of those matters provides a strong incentive to plead guilty and avoid trial, as I did and some of the guys from the Rise Above Movement did. Other cases were thrown out due to the sheer unconstitutionality of the law’s application. The only cases that went to trial were in the Charlottesville City court, and those were nothing resembling real trials, owing to the blatant corruption of the institutions.

Since the Plaintiffs and their allies have relentlessly and dishonestly attacked my revenue streams, I was unable to pay my attorneys in the case. The Plaintiffs then began filing meritless motions against me with the court, and the work burden these created caused my attorneys to withdraw as counsel. I initially opposed the motion to withdraw, and simultaneously began familiarizing myself with the case to prepare for the prospect of defending myself. In the course of that preparation, I realized that my interests in the matter had not been well represented thus far, and concluded that this would not improve with time, even if the court ruled in my favor on the motion to withdraw.

So, I recently fired my attorneys, and am now a pro se defendant.

This case has been pending for over two years. We were supposed to go to trial in July of 2019, but since the Plaintiffs know they cannot win this meritless suit, they have made outrageous discovery demands, and used these to delay the trial as much as possible. Roberta Kaplan told the Jewish Telegraphic Agency, and other people shameless enough to interview her, that the whole entire point of the suit is to bankrupt us. They have no illusions about being able to collect, and their $10,000,000+ budget exists for little purpose besides causing us as much discomfort as possible, so as to dissuade others from joining our cause.

The tactic has been remarkably effective thus far, but come trial, it will backfire, badly.

The entire premise of their lawsuit is that we conspired to perpetrate the violence of that weekend. Thankfully, we have a ton of proof to the contrary. Most notably, my much talked about body camera video, which some have deceptively said was me “snitching” actually contains entirely exculpatory evidence. It shows that we went out of our way to cooperate with law enforcement in advance, and did our best to avoid violence.

Not only that, but the Plaintiffs have been in possession of this proof for a long time. I had previously left this entirely in the hands of my attorneys, and only bothered to read the complaint very recently. Upon familiarizing myself with this, I realized it was even more ridiculous than I had initially believed. The claims aren’t just false, they are so absurd as to render it implausible that the Plaintiffs themselves ever believed them. So when it comes time for us to present our case, not only are we going to win, but they are going to be exposed as total, shameless, unapologetic, frauds.

For us to achieve that outcome,  I will have to dedicate my attentions, and talents, to the case. Going back and forth between the character I play on Radical Agenda, to the character I play on Outlaw Conservative, and then going into lawyer mode for the case, is a very substantial challenge. I also need to familiarize myself with the laws and precedents involved in the case, which is a considerable research project, and distracts from the time I would normally spend preparing for each show. To do both, one would have to suffer at the other’s expense. I no more want to produce substandard content, than I want to lose an easily winnable lawsuit. So the show has to take a back seat while I get up to speed.

On the upside, this information is very useful for the books I am working on, and a lot of the writing that I use for filings in the case, can be copied and pasted into the the drafts I am working on for the books. The other upside is that I am realizing the courts are not impossible for a guy like me to navigate pro se, and I think it is long overdue that I start suing people who defame me online. Some of these cases are very clear cut, and I would likely never even have to enter a courtroom. So I want to get very well versed in case law surrounding this subject as well, and begin using the courts to fight back against the lies told about me, and our cause.

Once a couple of communists have to write me checks, you can bet they’ll be more careful with their slander.

Books

Many of you have been suggesting for a long time that I write a book, and I have been contemplating doing so since my libertarian days. There have been numerous suggestions on what sort of book I should write. I have been of several minds with regard to this myself, and so I have been working on a few different drafts. I add a little to each one from time to time, depending on where my thinking happens to be in the spare time I’ve been able to dedicate to these projects.

Perhaps the most obvious would be a political or ideological work. I had started working on something like this while I was still so enthralled with libertarianism. I am today quite glad I never got around to publishing it, because I no longer wish to stand by those ideas. While I was in jail, you may have heard me remark about something I was working on titled “From Freedom to Fascism, and Back”, but even in that comparatively short time, my ideas have changed so dramatically, that I no longer wish to publish a political or ideological book.

Around the time of Andrew Anglin’s seeming mental breakdown and attacks on TheRightStuff.biz, I began a blog post in response which exceeded 11,000 words before I realized this was too complex a subject for that format. It also drew from prior experiences of mine to put things into perspective, some of which had already been spelled out in an older draft I had begun titled “The Beginning and End of the Radical Agenda”. In attempting to merge the two works, I found myself going through other posts of mine, to illustrate the ideological progression which led up to the present day, and in the process, came up with another idea entirely.

As it turns out, I’ve had a pretty interesting life. I had a thoroughly unenviable childhood, some extremely unique experiences during my education, adventures in the criminal justice system, a very active and tumultuous love life, and a very interesting professional career, all before I ever gave a damn about politics or ideology. Simultaneously, all of those experiences are what formed the basis of my worldview, which later lent itself to my political interests. What I am now working on is something of a cross between Hitler’s Mein Kampf, and J.D. Vance’s Hillbilly Elegy, adapted of course, to my own experience.

To tell the story, I use not only my own original modern writing, but 13 years of emails, and almost 7 years of blog posts.

To include everything would make this a prohibitively long read for most people. My blog posts alone total nearly 3,000 pages, and of course I add anywhere from three to twenty pages a week to this with show descriptions alone. The conclusion I reached, however, was that I should write the entire, unabridged work, and produce several different books from that through the editing process.

Most notably, the communist riots in Charlottesville that form the basis of the lawsuit, is a story that must be told. A lot of what I know about that weekend, I have not been able to publish on my website due to a court order, but that prohibition ends in nine months, and there is nothing saying I cannot publish this information in a book.

I also have an alternative theory on the “foreign interference” in the 2016 election. I recently discussed this on two different episodes of the Radical Agenda, but need to elaborate on substantially.

Some have suggested publishing collections of blog posts as their own books, which is certainly a worthwhile suggestion. I also think it would be worth revisiting and revising some of my libertarian writing, to bring them them into alignment with information I was unaware of at the time.

I am working on all of these things simultaneously, as well as talking to printers and publishers, educating myself on the process of publishing a book, and trying to anticipate the unique challenges I will face, due to the relentless deplatforming efforts I’ve been dealing with.

If I play my cards right, this will result in some much needed income for me, and some much needed promotion for the show. Both of those will go a long way to helping us achieve our shared goals.

Other Websites

Another thing you’ve heard me talk about is other websites I have built. Some of those I can talk about, others I cannot.

Of the ones I can talk about, I’ve mentioned SaidTheJew.com, and BlacksHateFags.com. I can talk about them, because those will most likely get deplatformed eventually based on content alone.

But, they also can be promoted in other ways, which ChristopherCantwell.com and RadicalAgenda.com are less conducive to, such as fliers and stickers. If you go to those sites, you’ll notice that they have similar layouts. They both have the Radical Agendas Radio Network audio player embedded, and they collect email addresses much in the way ChristopherCantwell.com does.

Those sites are fun, and the content I produce for them can be used as Radical Agenda show prep. When I am not working on other things, I want to try and get a bit more content on those sites, and once we get back into regular production of the show, I mean to try and update them at least once a week. I also want to put together some easily printed material that can be downloaded and used by fans for promotion. Driving traffic to those sites will go a long way toward red pilling new people, and have the added benefit of introducing them to the Radical Agenda.

There are several other sites which I cannot talk about, because I would defeat the purpose by publicly connecting them to me. For now it must suffice to say that I am working on building a few websites which are nothing like the Radical Agenda, but after they have had some time to build their own audiences, will lead those audiences down a path which serves our shared goals. One is geared toward pop culture, one is geared toward “normie conservatives”, and others target specific search terms pertaining to subjects I would be better off not mentioning here.

Technical Stuff

There are several technical tasks I cannot talk about, but I’ll mention a couple that I can.

From my Amazon Wish List, one of you were kind enough to purchase a “Noise Gate” which I haven’t set up yet. The noise gate prevents sounds under a certain level from being recorded, so for example, when you are listening to the show and you hear me breathing, or you hear mouth sounds that are not speech, this is designed to eliminate that. I tried to get that thing working, but found it more complex than I had anticipated, and put setting it up on the back burner. I need to take some time to tinker with this, and get it just right. Once I do, this will dramatically improve the audio quality of the show, and reduce the editing burden for PennedAndPronounced.com work.

Also, those of you who watch the show on JoshWhoTV or BitChute may have become frustrated that I only play the audio of videos that I comment on during the show. This is due to a limitation of my current audio mixer, and the way I have the studio equipment set up. Right now, I cannot play the video to the video feed, and have the audio for that video go out to the audio feed/podcast recording without creating an echo or feedback loop, because all of those things are happening on the same computer, and my mixer only has a singular auxiliary output, which is currently being used to prevent callers from hearing their voices fed back to them. I now have a spare computer, and one of you bought a better mixer from my Amazon Wish List. I need to take some time to tinker with these, and once I do, I’ll come back with a dramatically improved video production.

The Comeback

If I tried to “complete” all of these things before I got back to regular production, I never would get back into regular production. So, rest assured, that is not the goal. I just need to take some time to dedicate my attentions to these tasks, and once I get my head around them, I can get back to regular production of the live call in shows.

I intend to take at least two weeks off from regular production, and I will set a maximum of eight weeks. During that time, I will be putting out some content, but I just won’t be doing regularly scheduled live call in shows.

Stay tuned into my Email List, Telegram Channel, and RSS Feed, for regular updates, as I will hardly be quiet during this time.

If you think you can help with any portion of this, send me an email.

If you would like to help finance this work, you can do so with cryptocurrency at https://ChristopherCantwell.com/donate or you can mail payments to;

Christopher Cantwell
63 Emerald Street Unit 187
Keene, NH 03431

Radical Agenda S05E079 – Murderberg’s House of Horrors

Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg recently gave a talk at Georgetown University, supposedly reiterating his dedication to freedom of expression, in a world careening toward illiberal constraints on thought, word, and deed. The speech came on the heels of widespread hysteria over his meeting with such controversial figures on the Right as Tucker Carlson, and Byron York.

After seemingly discovering the obvious truth that censorious Left wing fanatics can never be satisfied, Zuckerberg now appears to be attempting to bring his company back from the brink of uselessness, by seeking some limits on the push to silence everyone the outrage mob sets their sights on. Presumably with some concern for the backlash which will ensue after a Republican landslide in 2020, Zuckerberg drew the line at deplatforming the President of the United States.

Simultaneously, he doubled down on his dedication to stamping out so called “hate speech” and “terrorist propaganda” and eliminating “foreign interference” in American elections, which to the careful observer, means only that the catastrophic policies of recent years will continue unabated. Politicians can lie on his platform, favored causes can break the laws of their jurisdictions, violence against disfavored groups can be promoted, but private citizens who speak out of turn, or who utter truths which inconvenience the egalitarian narrative, will continue to be suppressed for as long as governments permit such manipulation of the National conversation.

One need not be a statistician to see the foolishness of this.

A little over two years ago, hundreds of White Nationalists attempted to hold a permitted demonstration in Charlottesville, Virginia. They were set upon by violent communist agitators, who had announced, well in advance, their intent to violently disrupt the demonstration. This was a practice they had been engaged in for months prior, so much so that they became the subject of a DHS memo warning of the impacts. In the wake of that unprovoked assault, Facebook and other social media platforms, as well as PayPal and other payment systems, silenced and bankrupted the victims of this and other such attacks, while leaving the perpetrators free to celebrate their victory, and to plan and promote further such crimes.

Prior to this, how many “racist” mass murderers did you know the names of? At least in the United States, just one, most likely. Dylann Roof. Years prior to that, there was Anders Behring Breivik in Norway, but there was no serious talk of an “International White Supremacist Terror Threat” outside of the most reality detached Left wing ideological circles.

Well prior to Roof’s crime, one could get a 30 day ban from Facebook for relatively minor transgressions of the Leftist narrative. I personally had been banned for comparing Barack Obama to Hitler, well before I realized what an insult this was to Adolf Hitler, as one of countless examples. During a time when I still thought racism to be a very bad thing, I was banned from Twitter for calling somebody a nigger, as a joke. Lots of people knew, on some level, that discreet efforts to discourage dissent were well underway at all the major tech platforms, but we continued to advocate our ideas, peacefully, because we saw an opportunity, however slim, to spread our ideas without resorting to violence.

It was only AFTER our permitted demonstration was shut down by criminals, that people began to lose hope. It was only AFTER these dramatically ramped up attempts to silence the concerns of the Right, that Robert Bowers said “Screw your optics, I’m going in” and shot up a synagogue. It was only AFTER Alex Jones got kicked off of Facebook, that Brenton Tarrant killed dozens of Muslims in a New Zealand mosque. It was only AFTER Laura Loomer and Milo Yiannopoulos were deplatformed, that Patrick Crusius shot up a Walmart. It was only AFTER the “Okay” hand sign became a symbol of “White Supremacy” that Stephan Balliet said “the root of all these problems, is the Jew” and opened fire outside a synagogue, in Halle, Germany.

In a speech at the White House, given in 1962, President John F. Kennedy famously said that “Those who make peaceful revolution impossible will make violent revolution inevitable.”

That bit of wisdom pre-dated the birth of Mark Zuckerberg, and well before President Kennedy himself had been born, it was enshrined in the first amendment to the Constitution of the United States. It was no coincidence that it was followed immediately by our second amendment, guaranteeing to our citizens, the right to keep and bear arms.

I had titled Episode 77 of stage 5 “Listen” and addressed the senseless rampage of Stephen Balliet. Pressed for time, I failed to fully convey what I meant by this, and surely, I’ll similarly fail today, because the enormity of this defies even my enviable mastery of the English language, as well as the time constraints imposed by my schedule.

Our opposition insists that our concerns have no legitimacy. Convinced of their own moral superiority, or perhaps more accurately, unconcerned with morality, they demand our unconditional silence, and surrender. They consider their violence to be a legitimate form of political expression, and our political expression to be an illegitimate form of violence. If our side wins the election, the government has no legitimacy, but if they win, it has omnipotent powers beyond those described in the Constitution. When the Supreme Court favors their views, it is infallible, but if even the slightest prospect of a challenge to those views arises in the makeup of the Court, it must be fundamentally altered to prevent such challenges. Borders are illegitimate and we are all to be citizens of the world, until a foreign government whose views they oppose buys some Facebook ads, at which point we are to become a hermit kingdom, isolated from unapproved foreign opinions.

No wonder Zuckerberg is more willing to censor “hate speech” than political dishonesty. Dishonesty is what the status quo thrives on, and “hate speech” is the truth which threatens to set us free.

But truth, however seemingly disadvantaged at any given moment, has a certain unique power to it. Like water, it can be directed, shaped, or tainted, but not stopped.

In the bible, water is said to have drowned most life on Earth. Water carved out the grand canyon. Water has destroyed homes, and entire cities, in our lifetimes, before our eyes, more times than most of us could count. Man has built dams, sewers, canals, reservoirs, and vast networks of pipes for the delivery of water. We have built rafts, boats, submarines, and even floating houses, in a never ending effort to bring ourselves into harmony with the simultaneously lethal and life giving properties of water, but we dare not try to do away with it, for knowledge of both the futility of the pursuit, and our we need of it to survive.

Like water, truth will only submit to man’s demands so long as they are reasonable. It may similarly take the path of least resistance, but recall that when water determined the path of least resistance was to carve through 147 trillion cubic feet of rock, we got the Grand Canyon. When water determined the path of least resistance was through the lungs of every living thing on Earth, only Noah and the passengers of his Ark survived. With that in mind, it should come as no surprise that when truth determines the path of least resistance to be criminal violence, murder, and mayhem, that this is precisely the course it will follow.

If some billionaire tech company decided to build a dam along some river, and the resulting flood drowned the surrounding populations, would we curse the water, and demand those companies build more dams? Would we declare the water a terrorist threat? Would we shut down trade schools which taught plumbing? Would we ban sprinkler systems, showers, and sinks, and tell mankind to survive on Brawndo alone?

If Mark Zuckerberg had his way, we most certainly would, and the predictably lethal results would very much resemble that which we are watching unfold before our eyes today.

Less than two months after Robert Bowers opened fire on a Pittsburgh synagogue, a man named Gordon Danning, History Research Fellow at the Foundation for Individual Rights in Education, published a paper titled “Is the Cure Worse Than the Disease?: Censorship of Hate Speech May Well Increase Violence“, at the Nevada Law Journal Forum. The paper had been in the works prior to the massacre, and relied entirely on data collected well before the crime.

His question has no doubt been answered over the last 12 months. While Leftists used to rely almost entirely on fabrications for evidence of so called “hate crimes”, the circumstances they have designed through their censorious efforts, have created the only sort of environment that could lead White men to become the very caricature they made of us in earlier fictions. Seeing the world their ancestors built, descend into barbarism before their eyes, in near perfect, and clearly causal, correlation with their dwindling numbers, they have lashed out in previously unthinkable ways.

Today, we may consider ourselves fortunate that it is only those on the fringes. Men with nothing to lose, and nothing to gain, throwing their lives away, in seemingly senseless acts of violence that have no hope of altering our futures. But as the walls close in, and these warning shots are ignored, one may reliably profit by betting on the sense of dread and urgency that pushed those men over the edge, taking hold in the minds of more capable actors.

Should the truth see no better path than to carve through the Jews, then the truth will do to them, what the Colorado River did to the Colorado Plateau. No algorithm, no erasure, no boycott, no mob, no act of the legislature, no executive order, and surely no disingenuous speech professing devotion to the opposite of one’s demonstrated behavior, will be able to stop it.

Mark Zuckerberg, Jack Dorsey, Susan Wojcicki, Sundar Pichai, Matthew Prince, Dan Schulman, Patrick Collison, Jeff Bezos, and other tech titans who have taken it upon themselves to silence their political opposition, bear greater responsibility for past and future bloodshed than the weapons used, or even the killers themselves. They have had every reason to see the causal relationship between their acts, and the lives lost, and when this becomes obvious to a large enough portion of the population, they would do well to hope some shred of the US Constitution remains, because when that happens, the only hope they’ll have of avoiding repercussion, will be the the prohibitions on ex post facto laws, and bills of attainder.

 

 

There’s a lot more to get to, plus your calls at 323-9-AGENDA, that’s 323-924-3632

Join us, this and every Monday and Friday from 5-7pm US Eastern time, for another exciting episode of the Radical Agenda!

Follow Chris on Telegram or Parler or Minds. The Jews banned me from everything else.

Podcast RSS FeedSubscribe via Email

Today we will have live streaming video courtesy of JoshWhoTV. Subscribe to our JoshWho Channel here and watch live on JoshWhoTV.

You can listen live on the Radical Agendas Radio Network. Catch video on demand on our Bitchute channel!

Continue reading

Outlaw Conservative S01E038 – Dining With Zuck

Last night, a dozen Democrats did their best impressions of CNN opinion hosts, competing for the chance to lose next year’s presidential election to Donald Trump. I watched every minute of the entire spectacle, and under normal circumstances, would consider it my professional obligation to provide some post debate analysis on today’s episode.

Today’s Democrat Party, however, does not warrant much in the way of analysis. The strategy being deployed has nothing to do with actual policy, and has instead dwindled to what may as well have been grunts and clicks, designed to appeal only to unthinking emotional responses. This exercise in non-reality will be the politics of our future, if immigration is not slowed, and American birthrates are not increased, but the Democrats have, much to their detriment, jumped the gun. The collective IQ of the Nation has not yet dropped so far as to warrant this sort of campaigning, and as a result, Donald Trump is all but guaranteed victory in 2020.

The smart people have already figured this out. Mark Zuckerberg, however countless his flaws, is a smart person.

Seeing the writing on the wall, Zuckerberg has been confidentially meeting with conservative personalities, including Tucker Carlson. This revelation has driven Leftists absolutely insane, resulting in, amongst other things, the hashtag #DeleteFacebook recently trending on Twitter.

Little is known about the contents of their talks, but one imagines it has a great deal to do with Left wing bias in the platform’s staffing and content moderation policies. Republicans have been pointing out that the immunity provisions of the Communications Decency Act, only exempt neutral platforms from lawsuits over content. If Facebook and other social media companies are going to be in the business of content moderation, this in fact makes them publishers, who thus ought to be held legally responsible for the content on their platforms. Seeing the law applied in this way would either put Facebook out of business, or cause them to dramatically alter the way they do business, in the blink of an eye.

It has become obvious that the Trump administration will do nothing to rectify this situation before next year’s election, and so far it has seemed that the search and social media platforms have placed all their eggs in the singular basket, of aiding a Democrat victory in 2020. This path is fraught with perils, for a number of reasons.

Joe Biden’s increasingly obvious senility is becoming quite a burden for media propagandists to cover up. Narrative guidance can only take a party so far in a world plagued by live television and social media, however rigorous the censorship. Adam Schiff’s sham Trump impeachment inquiry, is also having the unfortunate side effect of drawing attention to the high priced influence peddling of Biden’s son Hunter, and compelling the thinking voter to view Biden as the very incarnation of Washington corruption. The “woke” hostility towards while males, particularly older, heterosexual ones, does not play well with the rapacious radicalism of the most verbose elements of the Democrat base.

While the RealClearPolitics average of Democrat Primary polling currently still gives Biden a 6 point lead, Warren leads Biden in Iowa and New Hampshire, the first caucus and primary states in the country, respectively. Success begets success, and it seems unlikely that Biden’s claim of electability would withstand two such substantial victories by Warren.

“The Squad” as they are known, far Left freshman Democrat members of the House, have endorsed the campaign of Bernie Sanders. While at first glance, this would seem to deprive the Warren’s sails of much needed wind, it also has the, perhaps intentional, effect of shielding Warren from accusations of being too extreme for voters in the general election. With Sanders well behind both Warren and Biden, trailing the latter by double digits, and given his recent heart attack, it seems unlikely the more forthcoming socialist is going to come within striking distance of the nomination. Once Sanders comprehends the futility of continuing, it is all but certain that he will put his weight behind Warren. From there, all future contents will be mere formalities, and Warren will have secured the nomination.

With Warren as the nominee, Big Tech will be met with the horrifying prospect of living up to their purported values. Warren has pledged to break up their monopolies, which would simultaneously devastate their financial prospects, and substantially increase the challenge of censoring the Internet. Warren is likely being profoundly disingenuous about this promise, but the Big Tech monopolists know all too well that policy is far less a concern than the direction of the National conversation. Even if Warren is bought off, and declines to break up Big Tech once elected, as one might safely bet, the thought police have very good reason to prevent such ideas from ever taking hold.

Suppressing one campaign promise of the Democrat nominee’s platform would border on impossible. To suppress the idea of breaking up their companies, they would have to suppress the candidate promoting the idea.

If Warren backtracks on the promise after winning the primary, it will harm her in the general.

Either move would help Trump.

If Trump secures a second term, and Republicans maintain their Senate majority, the impact on the judiciary will be so far reaching that few could fully comprehend the long term ramifications. Trump has already appointed a greater percentage of federal judges than any President since George Washington, and four more years of this practice would fundamentally reshape many of the lower courts. Ruth Bader Ginsburg keeps falling down and having cancer scares, making it appear unlikely that she will be capable of waiting out a Two Term Trump Presidency.  The Left’s fondness for kritarchy could thus soon backfire, leaving the lawfare battlefield solidly in favor of the Right, for the first time in recent memory.

If Zuckerberg has figured this out, one must imagine that other tech giants cannot be far behind. Those who are more interested in their continued success, than the approval of vocal transgender activists, will soon have to come to grips with the reality of our increasingly illiberal political landscape.

 

 

Join us, this and every Wednesday from 5-7pm US Eastern time for another exciting episode of the Outlaw Conservative Podcast, where I look forward to hearing from you at 808-4-OUTLAW, or on our Discord Server at https://OutlawConservative.com/discord

On another note, have you tried the Brave Browser?

Follow Chris on TelegramParlerMinds – Podcast RSS FeedSubscribe via Email

Today we will have live streaming video courtesy of JoshWhoTV. Subscribe to our JoshWho Channel here and watch live on JoshWhoTV.

You can listen live on the Radical Agendas Radio Network. Catch video on demand on our Bitchute channel!

Continue reading

Radical Agenda S05E078 – The Meme War Heats Up

The Leftist media is in hysterics over a YouTube video in which Donald Trump’s head is superimposed on a character from a fight scene in a movie. In it, Donald Trump walks into “The Church of Fake News,” wherein all the churchgoers have the logos of media organizations, or the faces of his political enemies, superimposed on them. As per their pattern and practice, the fake news enemies of the people, and their subversive Democrat allies, attempt to kill the President. Unfortunately for these assassins, the President happens to be in possession of a pistol, and superhuman combat abilities, which he uses to lay waste to the whole lot of them.

The Press, suddenly aware of the serious impacts media can have on people’s behavior, are now in full panic mode, concerned this will somehow cause people to go out and murder reporters.

The informed observer has to suspect that this is the voice of a guilty conscience speaking. The traitorous Press has been glorifying the violence of Black Lives Matter and Antifa since prior to the President’s election. They have been hammering home the demonstrably false narrative that Trump is guilty of treason by adhering to foreign foes, which would necessarily subject him to the death penalty. They parade sham psychiatrists around, depicting the President as a “Mad King,” whose assassin would be smiled upon by history. They dedicate inordinate amounts of page space and airtime to mass murderers, gleefully dancing on the yet to be dug graves of the still warm bodies of the victims, celebrating their propaganda victory, and providing incentive to future killers in search of precisely this kind of notoriety.

They took a decidedly different tone when Kathy Griffin posed for a picture which appeared to show her holding the President’s decapitated head. Take for example Aja Romano at Vox, who wrote at the time;

Right-wing media and opinion writers rushed to criticize the incident as an example of the left’s vicious hostility toward the president and his administration, calling it “the tip of the liberal violence iceberg” and “political pornography.” But the context behind Griffin’s photo further complicates the controversy it has attracted.

The violent nature of the Griffin photo is also in keeping with its creator’s artistic tradition. Shields’s photographic art often flirts with violent themes, even when it’s not actively targeting political figures. For instance, in 2011 he collected blood from celebrities for use in his art, and later drenched his studio, Lindsay Lohan, and other performers in it.

While it’s arguable that none of these artistic statements were as shocking as the picture of Griffin holding Trump’s decapitated head drenched in fake blood, it’s also important to understand that Griffin and Shields’s photo recalls another artistic tradition: images of women beheading men.

The artists Lavinia Fontana and Artemisia Gentileschi painted recurring images of the biblical story of Judith beheading Holofernes. For Gentileschi in particular, the story allowed her to assert her empowerment through the metaphorical beheading of men with positions of political and sexual power over her. Modern artists like photographer Cindy Sherman have also turned to this theme.

Ah, well, as long as it’s being done all the time in the name of feminism, I suppose this is a great idea.

Then there was that play where Trump was depicted as Julius Caesar, and assassinated, night after night, in front of a live studio audience, for months.  Also at Vox, Alissa Wilkinson tells us “Why outrage over Shakespeare in the Park’s Trump-like Julius Caesar is so misplaced” by writing;

But right-wing media outlets’ swift move to offense and outrage over the production — and the uproar that ensued — does call into question how well any of those who are upset grasp the history of Shakespeare and his place in the Western canon, and whether they’re at familiar with Julius Caesar itself.

Because in short, a lot of people have completely missed the point of both the production and the play.

Interestingly, none of the media outlets currently fretting over the Trump parody video are terribly concerned with the context of The Kingsman, from which the scene was composed.

The Trump assassination play was sponsored by the New York Times, and CNN, both of which have been relentlessly hostile, and often dishonest, critics of the President.

Speaking of the New York Times, they famously published a story imagining the President’s assassination by a Russian spy who, upon failure of his weapon to fire, is assisted by none other than a Secret Service agent, just as anxious to see his boss take the dirt nap;

The Russian waited until they were a few steps past before he drew the gun. He sighted on the center of the president’s back, and squeezed the trigger.

The Makarov misfired.

The Secret Service agent at the president’s shoulder heard the click, spun into a crouch. He registered the scene instantly, drawing his own weapon with razor-edge reflexes.

The Russian tasted failure. He closed his eyes and waited to pay the cost.

It did not come.

He opened his eyes. The Secret Service agent stood before him, presenting his Glock, butt first.

“Here,” the agent said politely. “Use mine. …”

How about Joe Biden, who announced his campaign for President of the United States, by releasing a video of the violence from Charlottesville, featuring none other than your humble correspondent, and calling the communists who planned and initiated that mayhem, “a courageous group of Americans”.

Then there is the media’s praise and promotion of Mark Bray, the Jewish professor who authored “Antifa: The Anti-Fascist Handbook” which glorified Left wing political violence across the last century, spanning several continents, in enthusiastic support of precisely the mayhem we’ve seen plague our discourse for the last several years.

No wonder the media is so concerned about images depicting their deaths. They know all too well what their intent is, when they promote violence across their mediums. They want Republicans to be assaulted and afraid to show their faces. They want the President to be assassinated, and incapable of leading the country. So they promote exactly that sort of thing across their pages, airwaves, and websites, and they’ve gotten everything but the President’s funeral as a return on their investment.

For the Right to respond in kind, terrifies them, precisely because they know how effective this sort of thing can be. They encouraged violence, they got it, and so they promoted more violence, and watched in glee as the violence escalated unchecked. They do not want to live in a world, where they are actually under the kind of threats they constantly pretend they are under. They fear if these sorts of things continue to proliferate, that the next mass shooter might kill somebody who actually deserves it, and they know full well that they would rank very high on that sort of hit list.

But, thanks in large part to their successful efforts to deplatform their critics, they are shielded from the sort of input that might cause them to consider why people would cheer at a video depicting their violent demise. All they know is that they hate the President, and that anyone who doesn’t agree with them is a Nazi, because that is what they see in their Twitter mentions, and talk about with one another over cocktails.

 

 

There’s a lot more to get to, plus your calls at 323-9-AGENDA, that’s 323-924-3632

Join us, this and every Monday and Friday from 5-7pm US Eastern time, for another exciting episode of the Radical Agenda!

Follow Chris on Telegram or Parler or Minds. The Jews banned me from everything else.

Podcast RSS FeedSubscribe via Email

Today we will have live streaming video courtesy of JoshWhoTV. Subscribe to our JoshWho Channel here and watch live on JoshWhoTV.

You can listen live on the Radical Agendas Radio Network. Catch video on demand on our Bitchute channel!

Continue reading

Radical Agenda S05E077 – Listen

I am usually the first to say that people who act in wicked ways ought not be rewarded with political success.

This is an important lesson our country has yet to learn about the Antifa and Black Lives Matter criminality, which has plagued our streets for several years. The repercussions of this failure will be with us for decades to come, even if we were to correct course right this minute. When violence and deception are rewarded with something so valuable as political power, one cannot be surprised if violence and deception become regular features of our existence.

Unfortunately, it is precisely that failure which has resulted in another sort of violence, far less favored by the media. White racial terrorism used to be a Left wing myth, evidence of which had to be fabricated in the form of fake hate crimes. Today it has become an all too real subject of our political discourse, brought to the forefront of our National conversation by a curious alignment of priorities, between the perpetrators of this violence, and its purported targets.

Stephan Balliet spent substantial time and effort on manufacturing improvised firearms and explosive devices, before carrying out his attempted attack on a synagogue in Halle, Germany. He left behind a manifesto of sorts, detailing more his methods than his motives, but is reported to have confessed his intent to police, and also streamed video of the assault, in which he blamed Jews for all too real problems facing his country, and ours.

He is not the first to do this, obviously. Before him came Patrick Crusius, Brenton Tarrant, Robert Bowers, and Dylann Roof, to name just a few. This list is likely to grow longer, perhaps long enough for us to begin forgetting the names, because of our society’s stubborn refusal to grapple with the root causes of these crimes, and worse, a morbid drive to double down on precisely the misguided and malicious patterns which preceded, and, arguably, necessitated them.

Normally when people resort to political violence, we rightly critique the methods of the criminal. Whatever one’s cause, no matter how righteous, violence, we insist, is never the answer. We live in democratic societies, where avenues are purportedly provided for political and social change, which do not necessitate bloodshed, thereby depriving such acts of justification. We purport to embrace free speech, respect the rights of individuals, and protect minorities from persecution at the hands of the Mob.

Had we continued to honor these time tested traditions, it would be difficult indeed to find a soul on this Earth who would watch the gruesome videos of these attacks, and find them inspiring. Their so-called “manifestos” would be dismissed by all, just as they are currently dismissed today by the majority, as the senseless rantings of deranged criminals. We would find them no more worthy of consideration, than we would the lyrics of gangster rap, or “death metal”.

Sadly, we have not honored these traditions. Some ideas, even some rather substantial facts, have been deemed too dangerous to be discussed openly, by our ruling classes. Their frantic and futile efforts to hide the truth, and suppress dissent, have resulted in precisely the outcome they purport to be trying to prevent. With each such outcome, these censorious efforts are increased, and coupled with ever louder calls to disarm the broader law abiding populace.

The inability to peacefully address legitimate grievances, combined with the drive for disarmament, create a wholly justified sense of dread, and urgency, amongst the growing numbers of people who understand these truths our rulers try so hard to suppress. Seeing in their futures a world where degeneracy, brutality, and chaos, prevail over the forces of decency, law, and order, otherwise good men reach the conclusion that cowardice alone prevents men from taking up arms against these threats to civilization.

People who reach these conclusions are further troubled by the observation that no leader has emerged to guide them toward victory. Anyone who emerges with the potential for that leadership, is rapidly set upon by the powers that be. They are assaulted, silenced, and sucked into costly legal battles which incapacitate them for years at a time.

Simultaneously, they see innocent men imprisoned, bankrupted, slandered, and worse. With time and repetition, the message becomes clear. Innocence is no defense against this threat, and thus remaining innocent has no benefit.

In a rapidly growing number of minds, these circumstances, taken together, spell out a clear choice. Either fight now, and hope that others follow suit, or cower slavishly, secure in the knowledge that far worse evils will result.

To attack the motives of such men, only proves their point. To try and silence these views, only confirms the suspicion. To disarm the populace, only increases the urgency.

The predictable result, is more of the same.

Since the intellectual capacity of those who created these problems is not a subject of debate, we can only conclude that this is precisely the desired outcome.

Our rulers, and their propagandists, do not mourn the loss of innocent life. Given their fondness for war and infanticide, that much should seem obvious. Every body, bullet, fire, and funeral, serves only as a pretext for their continued abuses. Every warrior who jumps the gun, and sacrifices himself in this “leaderless resistance” is one less warrior to support the inevitable emergence of a competent leader. Their stubborn insistence on grouping advocates of terrorism with advocates of policy, slanders the latter to the benefit of the former, because they know all too well that policy would rightly doom their ambitions.

They are quite literally “asking for it”, and for that reason, we would be fools to celebrate the granting of their wishes.

 

There’s a lot more to get to, plus your calls at 323-9-AGENDA, that’s 323-924-3632

Join us, this and every Monday and Friday from 5-7pm US Eastern time, for another exciting episode of the Radical Agenda!

Follow Chris on Telegram or Parler or Minds. The Jews banned me from everything else.

Podcast RSS FeedSubscribe via Email

Today we will have live streaming video courtesy of JoshWhoTV. Subscribe to our JoshWho Channel here and watch live on JoshWhoTV.

You can listen live on the Radical Agendas Radio Network. Catch video on demand on our Bitchute channel!

Continue reading

Radical Agenda S05E076 – Best of the Radical Agenda Volume 5

Here at the Radical Agenda, there are few things we take greater pride in than our work ethic. Among the things on that very short list, are our extensive body of prior excellent work, and our ambitions to produce even more amazing content in the future.

It is with those priorities in mind that we’ll be sacrificing the present for today, and leaving you with this Best Of compilation, in place of today’s live airing of the show.

Especially if you are a new listener, this will be a very special treat for you. Today’s Best Of Compilation is made up entirely of material produced prior to August of 2017. As long time listeners are well aware, the historic events of that month marked a dramatic shift in the tone of the content.

A lot of people say the show used to be better back then. That is by no means a unanimous consensus, as I’m certainly better informed than I was back then, but it is undeniable that the show was edgier and more high energy before I had to put everything through the mental filter of “What will the lawyers say?”.

I am confident you’ll enjoy these blasts from the past either way, and you may rest assured that I am hard at work addressing things which will improve our prospects for the future.

 

 

Follow Chris on Telegram or Parler or Minds. The Jews banned me from everything else.

Podcast RSS FeedSubscribe via Email

 

Continue reading