If there’s one thing we’ve learned about identity politics lately, it’s that the privileged group can never borrow from the identity of the oppressed. That’s why, when Ralph Northam decided to repeatedly show up in blackface back in the 80s, it destroyed his career thirty years later. Elizabeth Warren began the end of her political career, by proving definitively that her legal career was launched with affirmative action fraud, through false claims of native American ancestry. Even when the far more convincing Rachel Dolezal paraded around as a black woman, posting pictures of a fake black father, and going so far as to advance through the ranks of the NAACP, exposure of her fraud resulted in her cataclysmic fall from grace.

That sort of cultural appropriation is completely unacceptable, and no redemption is possible.

Likewise, when the patriarchy decided to put on a wig and sneak into the ladies room, there was such an uproar from the… Oh… Hang on a sec…

That didn’t work out quite the same at all. Did it?

Blackface is 100% completely unacceptable and irredeemable. Ladyface is different.

Ladyface resides at the intersection of gender, sexuality, and mental illness. It runs no risk of being humorous or enjoyable, sterilizes the participants, incurs a coin toss suicide rate, and invariably results in the victimization of children. These are high value traits in a cultural phenomenon to the people who want to destroy mankind, so ladyface is promoted as a protected class, conveniently tacked onto the end of the LGB scheme, just before the catchall Q, and soon to be followed by P.

It stands in contrast to the comedic value and reversibility of blackface, which we remind the listener, is thoughtcrime. Blackface bad. Ladyface good. You’ll need to remember this for the quiz later, after we talk about the Nazi lesbian feminists.

Ladyface, or transgenderism, as these predatory appropriators of culture like to call it, burst onto the scene like no other social justice cause ever had. From the dawn of time until the second term of Barack Obama’s presidency, it was socially acceptable to be skeptical of gay marriage. Ladyface had no such patience. Before Kim Davis could make bail, it seemed every deviant with a makeup budget suddenly had a constitutional right to cop a lean in the ladies room, and saying otherwise was a greater crime than climate denial.

The Intersectional Left has always been a dangerously fragile coalition. Their hatred of the dominant group is all that ever united them, and the incoherence of the doctrines pedaled by their elites was only glued together by the ignorance of their masses. The greatest challenge to such a dynamic is that, once one begins to stitch together a network of inadequate people that large and diverse, some of the participants will inevitably have shortcomings in areas other than intellect, and amongst your teaming masses of fools, sharper minds are bound to emerge and open their troublesome mouths.

We saw this happen with Milo Yiannopoulos, the seemingly lone homosexual capable of realizing that the Islamization of his country would not improve the lot of his dating pool. Not even his Jewish ancestry could protect him from the accusations of being a Nazi. His attempt to speak at University of California Berkeley became a key escalation in the revolution, as black clad anarchists maced women and set fires and smashed humans and windows with clubs, to the tune of a hundred thousand dollars.

But Milo was relatively easy for the Left to destroy. He was, after all, a pale skinned male who stood in opposition to the Democrat Party. Likewise, immigration and the racial connotations of it, were buried so far beneath the pile of subversive lies that few had the courage to speak the truth. The cultural power of the Left is such that most men would rather see their country destroyed, than speak out against their number one power grab.

There was one thing though, which we would not let the Left destroy, and that was our women. Indeed, it was only under the guise of protecting women and girls that so many of the Left’s machinations ever gained any traction at all. The trick to feminism was not so much in convincing women to sterilize themselves and murder their children, but rather convincing men to endorse such a plot to prove their love of the fairer sex.

Ladyface was the wholly predictable result of egalitarian sex propaganda. If men and women are equal, then it necessarily follows that they are interchangeable as well. That might sound okay on the pages of some Marxist text book, but it falls apart once you see a man in a dress trying to blend in with the ladies. “Trans lesbians” in particular stand out as obvious predators, and the violent anger they display when refused access the women they seek to prey upon, only confirms the suspicion.

The ladyface mafia has thus declared war on women, and lesbians. This presents a unique challenge for the Left, since lesbians, being both female and homosexual, ranked quite highly in the progressive rankings of victimhood, until now. The bathroom invaders have declared the lesbians a hate group, indeed, they have been called literal Nazis, for demanding exclusivity.

The lesbians however, have been caught off guard. For many years, they had the cosmopolitan elites dumping money, lawyers, and even violent criminals on anyone who dared resist their advances. They were wholly beyond any criticism until the rootless scum attempted to stick them with the T.

Now, faced with the frightening prospect of compulsory ladyface acceptance, they have turned to the most unlikely of corners for support.

In Baltimore, mayor Catherine Pugh had launched an LGBTQ Commission in the city government in early 2018. Julia Beck, an adult human female homosexual jumped at the opportunity to represent lesbian interests on the commission. She would not last long, however.

Beck described the affair in a piece titled “How I became the most hated lesbian in Baltimore” at AfterEllen.com;

Our very first meeting was in May. To make the commission “as inclusive as possible,” Mayor Pugh invited applicants to a welcoming reception. When I arrived, Ava Pipitone, president of Baltimore’s Transgender Alliance, was preaching everyone’s favorite buzzword: “inclusion.” He seemed a caricature of femininity with overtly demure mannerisms and performative vocal fry. At the end of his prepared speech, Mayor Pugh tenderly embraced him, thanking him for being “so brave” at the podium.

She later describes a “pride parade” where The Baltimore Trans Alliance sponsored a dance called “Queer Qrush”, which advertised that “exclusionary” lesbians would be “hung (sic) by their necks” should they dare to attend.

For pointing out these problems, Beck was removed from her position on the commission, accused of “violence” for calling a male rapist in ladyface “he”, and targeted by the mob.

From here, Beck went on to make unlikely alliances. In January of 2019, she joined a panel at the Heritage Foundation titled “The Inequality of the Equality Act: Concerns from the Left“. There, she gave an impassioned speech about the predatory nature of ladyface and the violence and deception brought to bear against her for speaking out. Just last night, she joined Tucker Carlson to discuss the perils of defending “biological reality”.

Beck joins a growing chorus of Left leaning folk who see this predation for what it is.

Jesse Singal, a Jewish leftist, has been repeatedly accused of being worse than a Nazi by a “big name on the Left” and subjected to “eliminationist” rhetoric by the same. His crime? Questioning the wisdom of pumping pre-pubescent children with cross sex hormones and prepping them for invasive surgery, before their minds are sufficiently developed to make informed decisions about such things.

Meghan Murphy, a contributor to Feminist Current, was permanently banned from Twitter for uttering such hateful phrases as “women aren’t men.” She describes a situation unfolding where she was subjected to threats and harassment by the Left, which Twitter refused to act upon, and finding unlikely support from the Right.

Despite my disinterest in seeing graphic pornography on Twitter and in being called a “TERF c**t” who should “drink bleach,” I accept that this is something I am likely to be exposed to on Twitter, and choose to use the platform anyway. Cruel and graphic comments are things, for better or for worse, I am accustomed to and that, frankly, don’t bother me much at this point. If you are a public figure, you do just get used to this kind of thing.

What is insane to me, though, is that while Twitter knowingly permits graphic pornography and death threats on the platform (I have reported countless violent threats, the vast majority of which have gone unaddressed), they won’t allow me to state very basic facts, such as “men aren’t women.”

As a result of these attempts by Twitter to silence me, the right has leapt to support me, or at least engage with me, and criticize Twitter’s nonsensical, unwritten policies (nowhere in their Terms of Service does it say users may not differentiate between men and women or ask questions about transgender ideology). While the left continues to vilify me, and liberal and mainstream media continue to mostly ignore feminist analysis of gender identity, people like Dave Rubin and Ben Shapiro (and hundreds of right wingers and free speech advocates online), and right wing media outlets like the Daily Wire and The Blaze have either attempted to speak with me and understand my perspective, expressed support, or covered this undeniably ridiculous decision on the part of Twitter.

Murphy has filed a lawsuit against Twitter for the ban.

Even the Women’s March has not been immune from the predatory ladyface mob. Their pink hats, a symbol of female genitalia, have been declared a hate crime by ladyface impersonators who want their male parts to be accepted as equally feminine.

Donald Trump said it best at a recent rally in El Paso, Texas: “The Democrat Party has never been more outside of the mainstream. They’re becoming the party of socialism,
late term abortion, open borders, and crime”. Once Americans make the connection that Democrats are also the party of ladyface, their political doom will be sealed.

The coalition of the Left has been made up of White women, racial minorities, and sexual deviants. They simply cannot win elections without keeping that motley crew together, but as ladyface threatens women, immigration threatens gays, and their economic time bombs drag down the entire country, those divergent interests become irreconcilable.

It is in the outrageous and disgusting and predatory behavior of the ladyface threat that we see the full folly of Leftist ideology. Egalitarianism is degrading to women, because women have always held a very special status in our society. No amount of hormones, surgery, propaganda, or political pressure will ever bring men to that very special place in our hearts. As women come back to the Right, seeking our protection from this menace, they will find it, and in the comfort of our security they will again come to respect our authority.

So before we are accused of hate speech for stating the obvious, let me extend my most sincere gratitude to these female impersonators. You are the unlikely saviors of this republic, and while you will have no place in its future, our history will no doubt record your vital contribution.

What’s next? Beats me, but I look forward to finding out, and hearing from you at 808-4-OUTLAW if you would like to be on the show, this and every Wednesday from 5-7pm US Eastern time.

Want to share this on Facebook, or with polite company? Share it from OutlawConservative.com!

Catch the live video stream on Stream.me.

You can also listen live on the Radical Agendas Radio Network. Catch video on demand on our Bitchute channel!

The players on this site now have 24/7/365 streaming content!

You can always listen to live Radical Agenda episodes at

https://ChristopherCantwell.com/live

This production is made possible by the financial support of listeners and readers like you. I literally cannot do this without you. I sell shirts, hats, mousepads, and other cool stuff, though sadly, we can only accept cryptocurrency. Or you can just fork over money by donating.

Podcast: Play in new window | Download

Subscribe: Apple Podcasts | Android | RSS

It has been quite a week since we last spoke, fellow outlaws. The communists have devised a biological weapon which took me out of commission over the weekend, rendering me incapable of doing my uncensored production on Monday. Either that, or I caught the flu. I am inclined to believe the latter, but I have learned from my study of our enemy that one should never attribute to chance, that which can be explained by treason.

In either case, I am back to about 80% of my power level today, and I am glad to have the chance to speak with you. Last we spoke, I brought to you a recording from the People’s Democratic Republic of Virginia. An enemy stronghold which held me captive for eleven months, and to this day holds some of our best men as prisoners of this war. On that recording, you heard our ruthless and terrible foe advocate the murder of infants, and by this I do not mean the routine slaughter our federal government subsidizes to the tune of half a billion dollars a year, but rather the celebratory rise of a new frontier in depravity.

As they did in New York, our foe sought to legalize unlimited abortion, right up until the moment of birth. A practice so barbaric, that even as the mother was in labor, and the only medically advisable thing to do would be to deliver a live baby, the adherents of this monstrous death cult would pierce the child’s skull with a scissor just before it had the chance to breathe the same air as you and I, depriving it of the opportunity to scream for the help it was entitled to by the laws of both God and Man.

That measure, we can be thankful, failed in committee. Indeed we must be thankful that it failed there, because had it made its way to the governor’s desk, it would certainly have become law. What I failed to deliver to you last Wednesday, before we ran out of time, was something even more horrible than what I have here described thus far. The Democrat governor of that Commonwealth, Ralph Northam, a former pediatric neurologist, went still further in a subsequent radio interview. In that interview, he declared it would be acceptable to kill the child even after it had been born.

Now, I understand that reasonable people can debate the subject of abortion. There are those who make a convincing argument that our demographic problems in the United States would be exponentially worse were this practice pushed underground. Morality, much as I would like to think of it as firm and constant, is not universally agreed upon, and there are worthwhile distinctions to be made between “us” and “them”.

Yet I shiver to think, that as a woman was in labor, having second thoughts at the last moment, that she might cry out “No! Make it stop!” and a responsible physician would say anything other than “It’s going to be okay, Momma! Your son or daughter will be here any second and you’re going to be so proud!” That instead, some anti-human ghoul with a scalpel would gleefully pierce that child’s brain, and deliver a murder victim instead of a healthy child. Or worse, as Governor Northam described, that a healthy child would be delivered, kept comfortable, and then, after a deliberation of the adults in the room, they would decide whether that healthy child would live or die.

In a society which would even contemplate legalizing such barbarism, what choice have we but to become outlaws? If that’s the law, then make a criminal out of me. If that is what you call the liberation of women, then let me proudly bear the label of patriarchal oppressor. Surely freedom is a small price to pay, for a woman to never know the guilt of her womb becoming a crime scene.

Now, you might assume from what I’ve said here that Governor Northam’s career would be ended by such a horrifying reveal, and indeed it does appear that Mr. Northam has lost the support of his own party. Sadly though, it was not his bloodlust for newborns which incurred this penalty.

On the first day of Black History Month, BigLeaguePolitics.com revealed a page from the Governor’s 1984 medical school yearbook, which contained a photo of two men. One of the men wore a KKK hood, the other had his face darkened by makeup. For this supposedly “racist” display, the Democrats quickly drew their shivs, and went in for the kill. At long last, the Left’s race war abandoned its partisan roots. We pause here to remind the reader that this actually happened, and the 1984 reference is purely coincidental.

Northam quickly acknowledged his decision to appear in the photo, and apologized for it in a video statement released via Twitter. When CNN aired the apology, they “mistakenly” identified Northam as a Republican. No fake news here, move on, citizen.

But when this failed to appease the mob, Northam reversed course, now insisting that he had not been in this particular racist photo. He explained that his confusion stemmed from yet another day when he donned shoe polish upon his face, to participate in a dance contest dressed as Michael Jackson who, in 1984, was still black.

But even this lie would not quell the racial rebellion which had to this point in time been reserved strictly for Republicans. Northam, shocked by the seething hatred coming from his own party, refused to resign his post. In his own mind, he was an ally of the mob. He had, after all, endorsed a baseless allegation of racism against his opponent Ed Gillespie in the general election, which won him the office from which he was now expected to resign. Surely he cursed the poor training of this pets, who had now so savagely turned on him.

One of those pets was his own Lieutenant Governor, Justin Fairfax. Fairfax, a black man himself, stopped short of calling for the Governor’s resignation. He played it cool, awaiting instead the mob’s vengeance to bring him his imminent promotion. Yet, the impossible and contradictory virtue standards of the Left quickly seized upon him as well.

A woman named Vanessa Tyson alleges that Fairfax sexually assaulted her at the 2004 Democratic National Convention. Tyson had brought her survival story to the Washington Post but, in stark contrast to their coverage of Brett Kavanaugh, the Post let the story “die in darkness”.

Fairfax denies the allegation, saying that though the encounter did in fact occur, it was consensual. This matters not, of course, because “We believe survivors” is the new mantra of the Left. Evidence matters not, only accusations, because all men are guilty of rape by virtue of their masculinity, which is by definition toxic. Recall the “Smash Racism DC” mob confronting Ted Cruz at a restaurant, chanting exactly this. Recall Kamala Harris, Mazie Hirono, and Kirsten Gillibrand all saying that they believed Christine Ford, even in the face of exculpatory evidence, just because she was a so called “survivor”.

To say the least, it will be interesting to see how these supposed standards hold up, now that the accused is a black Democrat. One suspects that the Keith Ellison standard will prevail over the Brett Kavanaugh standard.

And then, just last night, God Emperor Trump gave his State of the Union address. The speech had been postponed by House Speaker Nancy Pelosi as a political tactic during the government shutdown. Now, having gotten Trump to fold before the food stamp riots ensued, Nancy invited the President to give his address.

Democrat women dressed in all white, and refused to stand during moments which brought others to their feet. Moments like record low black unemployment, protecting newborn infants from murder, honoring veterans, infrastructure spending, and even paid family leave. They certainly did not appreciate Trump’s pledge that America would never become a socialist country.

One thing they did all cheer for, that the entire body stood and cheered for, was women’s record participation in our labor force, and in our government. If anything makes me doubt the sincerity of our president, it is this. He watches Tucker Carlson. He knows what this feminist plague has done to our birthrates.

It is this slavish dedication to the false god of egalitarianism that has caused our citizenry to stop replacing itself. It is this failure to reproduce which Democrats credit with their diabolical immigration policy. President Trump knows this, and yet he cheers on this insanity, as the one point those who have pledged to destroy him enthusiastically endorse.

The seeds of our destruction have been sown, watered, fertilized, and sprouted. They have been nurtured, and grown, and now comes time for the harvest. In the halls of our Congress, the men and women we elected to guide our nation to prosperity, stand and cheer loudly for the very thing which makes our demise most certain. The Left tells us that our men are wicked, and then tells our women to behave like us. Our leaders, whether convinced by the lies or in on the plot, rise to their feet and cheer for this savagery.

The state of our Union, fellow outlaws, is not strong. It is long dead, and in the late stages of decay. The political bonds which have connected us to our countrymen have long been dissolved, and if we are to survive at all, we must assume among the powers of the earth, the separate and equal station to which the Laws of Nature and of Nature’s God entitle us.

What’s next? Beats me, but I look forward to finding out, and hearing from you at 808-4-OUTLAW if you would like to be on the show, this and every Wednesday from 5-7pm US Eastern time.

Want to share this on Facebook, or with polite company? Share it from OutlawConservative.com!

Catch the live video stream on Stream.me.

You can also listen live on the Radical Agendas Radio Network. Catch video on demand on our Bitchute channel!

The players on this site now have 24/7/365 streaming content!

You can always listen to live Radical Agenda episodes at

https://ChristopherCantwell.com/live

This production is made possible by the financial support of listeners and readers like you. I literally cannot do this without you. I sell shirts, hats, mousepads, and other cool stuff, though sadly, we can only accept cryptocurrency. Or you can just fork over money by donating.

Christmas was over a month ago, but with snow on the ground here in the Granite State, and Democrats dropping gifts on conservatives daily, we here at the Outlaw Conservative feel like breaking out the egg nog and celebrating.

Since the age requirement of presidential candidates is one of few articles of our constitution the Left has not yet managed to subvert, Alexandria Ocasio Cortez will not be running for President next year. In her stead, Kamala Harris has taken up the banner for the diversity first wing of the Democrat Party. Like Cortez, she builds upon this coalition by appealing to the economically illiterate.

Her “Medicare for all” proposal sounds good on its face to the uninitiated. “Free health care” is a literal no brainer. If you don’t think about it, it’s fantastic. Everybody likes free stuff, and it’s hard to think of anything more valuable than lifesaving medicine produced and practiced by the greatest minds the world has to offer.

Best of all, the socialism of Cortez and Harris isn’t that racist socialism of those icky “National” socialists. No walls for them, and certainly no KKK-esque ICE agents deporting illegal immigrants who walk across that wide open space that used to delineate American sovereignty, back in the bad ole days. Medicare for all is something they take literally, no discrimination whatsoever. If you walk into a doctor’s office within any territorial jurisdiction they control, you can get everything from abortion to euthanasia from the benevolent hand of the State. No questions asked, no payments required.

Fortunately for Democrats, our immigration, economic, and social policies for the last half century have produced an abundance of no brainer types. Indeed, Vox’s Dylan Scott describes the Medicare for all plan as the Democrat Party’s “litmus test” for 2020. The Party of Poverty loves them some dummies, and when they run short domestically, they aim for imports, hence the abhorrence of immigration enforcement.

It seems exceedingly unlikely that anyone is going to have a chance of winning a Democrat primary without this pie in the sky promise. If you want to be the Democrat Party’s nominee for president, you’ll have to go for the lowest common denominator. This isn’t limited to Cortez and Harris. Bernie Sanders, Elizabeth Warren, Kirsten Gillibrand, Pete Buttigieg, and many others have supported the proposal.

Then again, the party of Political Correctness might want to consider just how correct this works out to be, in the politics beyond the primary. Some savvy folks who understand the rules of the democracy game decided to ask the American people what they thought. When given a simple question like “Do you want free health care” they of course tend to say yes. Tell them that it would eliminate private insurance, drive taxes through the roof, and cause all manner of other problems, and they reconsider.

Moreover, not all Democrats are inner city poors. Some actually work for a living, and others are wealthy elites, rootless cosmopolitan types without much loyalty to a country, much less a party. Wealthy, White presenting billionaires like Mike Bloomberg and Howard Schultz are none too enthused about the proposal. They, rightly, point out that it would bankrupt the country, and that our existing debt burden threatens the security of the Nation as it stands. Elizabeth Warren’s “ultra millionaire’s tax” on wealth, would chase capital out of this country faster than a New York feminist can drive a spike through a third trimester fetal skull. Combine all that with open borders and even Bernie Sanders breaks out the calculator.

Enter Howard Schultz. If you had told me five years ago that this lifelong Democrat and former Starbucks CEO would be the savior of this country, I’d have laughed at you. Yet, here we find ourselves with the very real prospect of him being indicted by Robert Mueller on campaign finance violations for giving the Trump campaign something truly priceless.

Not only is Schultz calling out the economic insanity of both parties, he’s plotting to run as a center left independent. A Democratic Ross Perot. The perfect middle ground for self loathing middle class American Citizens who think it sinful to vote for Trump, but don’t want their country destroyed by the far Left. He gives those soon to be former Democrats the perfect excuse to walk out of that voting booth with their heads held high knowing that they are neither racists nor idiots, a rare opportunity indeed.

Trump says Schultz lacks the guts, and though many suspect he’s just egging the guy on, it would be a brave move indeed. Those who oppose the Left’s pernicious pursuit of plenary and perpetual political power, tend to find themselves in the crosshairs of nefarious types. His ethnic background is unlikely to protect him from the accusation of being a Nazi, and Nazis often find their medical expenses piling up at the hands of masked anarchists immune from prosecution.

It’s going to be an interesting couple of years, fellow outlaws. It’s getting ugly out there, no doubt, but methinks the intersectional Left is about to meet some challenges in keeping their rainbow coalition together as the pressure mounts. The Democrat strategy of wiping out the middle class in favor of the ultra rich and ultra poor was bound to see interests diverge at some point. Beyond the class divides, the women’s march got accused of anti-Semitism for their embrace of Louis Farrakhan, feminists are in revolt against transgenderism, immigration is negatively impacting the wages and employment prospects of African Americans, and if you thought it was bad politics to attack ethnic minorities, it’s even dumber to attack the ethnic majority.

Meanwhile, whatever the countless flaws of the GOP, there’s no question among us as to who we view as the least of the evils. Trump may have caved on the government shutdown, but that’s what happens when you play chicken with the Left. Their entire program is the destruction of this country, and shooting hostages is their hobby.

What’s next? Beats me, but I look forward to finding out, and hearing from you at 808-4-OUTLAW if you would like to be on the show, this and every Wednesday from 5-7pm US Eastern time.

Want to share this on Facebook, or with polite company? Share it from OutlawConservative.com!

Catch the live video stream on Stream.me or Twitch.

You can also listen live on the Radical Agendas Radio Network. Catch video on demand on our Bitchute channel!

The players on this site now have 24/7/365 streaming content!

You can always listen to live Radical Agenda episodes at

https://ChristopherCantwell.com/live

This production is made possible by the financial support of listeners and readers like you. I literally cannot do this without you. I sell shirts, hats, mousepads, and other cool stuff, though sadly, we can only accept cryptocurrency. Or you can just fork over money by donating.

Podcast: Play in new window | Download

Subscribe: Apple Podcasts | Android | RSS

Back when I was a libertarian, I was focused like a laser beam on restraining government authority. Debating the merits of such and such a policy was thus beyond the scope of my tactics in many cases. Instead, my fellow subversives and I found certain points of resistance common to most policies, and piled on the pressure at those focal points to achieve our desired outcomes in arguments.

The most common one of course, went directly to the libertarian axiom of non-aggression. Whatever policy anyone ever wanted to implement in government was inherently wicked because it necessarily involved some coercive element, even if it was something so innocuous as that it was funded by taxation. “Only a moral outcast would use VIOLENCE to achieve their desired social outcome! You Statist!”

If the target was not swayed by this borderline pacifist moral posturing, the remarkable efficiency of the free market would surely finish the job in most cases. It did not matter if the topic at hand was health care or police departments, privatization was the answer to everything. This tactic was clearly useless in debating leftists, since their wanton lust for failure made them hostile to the very concept of a coherent economic system, but you could sway a good number of conservatives this way on most topics. Like Mitt Romney, most of us like being able to fire people who do a bad job, and there never exists any shortage of government failures to point out, when making the case for market provision of services.

There was one notorious impediment to our propagandizing that many libertarians found challenging to overcome. It was so universal that all libertarians pondered the best way to respond to it. This obstacle to our anti-State agenda was not buried in a philosophy book or some article of the founding documents, but something far more universal and inseparable from the human condition. Our challenge in penetrating this barrier was neither in the complexity of the issue at hand, nor the character limit on Twitter. Indeed it was only three small words which one could find in the vocabulary of any pre-schooler. Were it not for this simple, universal, freedom obliterating phrase, statues of Ayn Rand would surely replace those of MLK, and you could shop around for police departments like you do for car insurance.

“For the Children!”

Oh, how we hated those three little words. Here we are trying to create a market Utopia, and you sheeple are talking about dependent little brats who can’t even sign contracts yet.

I didn’t have kids, and at the time I didn’t even really want them. The same, perhaps unsurprisingly, went for most of my co conspirators. So we really wouldn’t even have an answer for this concern except to repeat the same words, “for the children” in a mocking tone. We would then insist that the interests of children and parents were unworthy of differentiation. Once we had a society of morally upstanding people who did not initiate force, and free markets made us all fabulously wealthy, parents could decide on how to keep their kids away from drugs and sexual predators, if they thought such precautions were worthy of the effort.

Today I have a little bit better of an understanding as to what motivates people, but at the time I was perpetually confused as to why this did not work. Perhaps you’re a libertarian still suffering through this, so I’ll attempt to shed some light on the subject.

Every economist worth his salt knows the name of John Maynard Keynes, who proliferated many of the economic ideas which currently plague the Earth.  In response to critics who warned his designs would fail in the long run, he said smugly, “In the long run, we’re all dead”. Keynes had no children of course, and some speculate this was due to his, shall we say, curious romantic choices. Were it otherwise, perhaps he would have seen beyond the horizon of his own life. Perhaps then, equally short sighted economic policy would not be the norm throughout the developed world today.

Obviously the libertarians in the audience are frustrated at this point, and cursing me for my ignorance. Milton Friedman’s famous “We are all Keynesians now” surely does not apply to them, and the fact that I’ve mentioned someone’s intimate preferences without a rainbow flag in hand obviously makes me the worst sort of ignorant fool. Fortunately, I am no dummy. I know that Keynes is the archetypal supervillain of every libertarian effort to cram economics into children’s books.

The point being made is that the same short sightedness which gives validity to critiques of Keynesian economics, is likewise endemic to the prevailing libertarian perspective on what most would describe as social issues. “My body my choice” is fine if you think your body is the only thing that matters, but for those of us with higher aspirations than our own immediate gratification, “for the children” is a very real concern which cannot be dismissed by mocking tones or moral posturing.

Moreover, “for the children” is not a concern limited to one’s own offspring. Your certainty that you would provide your kids with the best education the market can offer, or that you would teach your kids not to use drugs, or that your kids will not seek cosmetic surgery below the belt because they saw a YouTube video, is almost completely irrelevant to the maintenance of the broader population. Who we live amongst, how they behave, and what that all will lead to in three generations, is actually of the utmost importance to many adults.

Since this is so important, we cannot think of it only in simple and direct terms. The simplistic view of “I am not being stabbed in this moment, therefore there is no aggression” is rightly rejected by sane people who are capable of spotting patterns.

We do not want to wait until one of our children is harmed by a predator before we act. So if someone is discovered with videos of children being exploited, the moral theorizing of leftists and libertarians over how the non-aggression principle applies to such material is irrelevant. We want our society to be as hostile as we can make it to people with such proclivities. So even material produced without the actual exploitation of a child, such as that depicted in cartoons or digital animations, or even written fiction on the subject, is met with similar hostility. We do not want to permit the cultural acceptance of any level of child exploitation, or ideations thereof, so we suppress it through force of law.

Drugs, no matter how much propaganda is pedaled by the now booming marijuana industry, are bad. Mmmkay? The lifestyle that comes along with using drugs is harmful enough before we discuss the health impacts of individual substances. Debates over the disparate impacts of marijuana vs. alcohol vs. cocaine are thus not central to the issue at hand. The society at large is best served by sober young people growing up to be sober adults, and the best way to accomplish this is to prevent drugs from becoming culturally acceptable. Thus we suppress both supply and demand through force of law. If we had our wits about us, we would suppress it in media and culture as well, just like we do with child exploitation.

Pro-drug propaganda parading as free speech or political debate, is no less harmful than media portraying the exploitation of children. We can see this with today’s widespread acceptance and even celebration of marijuana. Just a few short years ago, this was a completely fringe idea being circulated in obscure magazines and on Internet message boards. Of course, as those magazines and message boards reached more and more people, ideas changed, and laws followed. First we got so called “medical marijuana” which was prescribed for everything from stress and headaches to cancer and AIDS. Once the scam nature of those initiatives was on full display, everybody admitted that this was about recreational use the entire time, laws were altered again, and now even the former Republican Speaker of the House John Boehner is running around lining his pockets with legalized recreational drug money.

Does it stop there? Of course not. Some US states and localities have just decided that enforcing their drug laws isn’t worth doing. Some of have established “safe” injection sites where junkies can come to get a fix with the assistance of a medical professional. Others hand out clean needles at taxpayer expense. Some have even hired government employees whose only duty is to run around picking up used needles. Last November, Oregon approved language for a ballot referendum which her citizens will vote on in 2020, that would legalize hallucinogenic mushrooms in that state if successful. Anybody who thinks it will stop there, would do well to remember how far the rainbow flag wavers have pushed their agenda.

How many of you remember the good ole days when the discussion of intimacy between two men or two women was limited to what consenting adults did in the privacy of their own bedrooms? Our younger listeners might have trouble remembering a day with out so called “Pride” parades, but people my age and older don’t. Recall that just a few short years ago, Barack Obama knew he had to say “marriage is between one man and one woman” to get elected as President of the United States. Before the end of his second term, the Obergefell vs. Hodges decision came down from the Supreme Court, and the White House was lit up with rainbow lights of celebration. Kim Davis, an elected Democrat in Kentucky, was jailed for obeying the constitution of her State, and refusing to issue these types of marriage licenses.

Once they had their so called “marriage equality” did they stop there? Of course not.

The newest form of bigotry, in the twisted minds of leftists, was insisting that men stay out of the ladies room. This new revolution of so called “gender identity” was perhaps the boldest we’ve ever seen. They skipped entirely the usual formalities common to the progressive initiatives of old. They never bothered to present an even slightly moderated position on the issue. They did not even bother with privacy or personal autonomy like the old libertarian scams. They went straight to forcing non-discrimination on the populace, and demonizing anyone who questioned it as a thought criminal who deserved to be assaulted without recourse to the law. So rapidly did this insanity make it to the forefront of our politics, that when Kamala Harris announced her run for the presidency, it was one of the first topics she addressed.

Remember back when they used to accuse us of paranoia for saying this ever expanding alphabet soup of intimate proclivities was aimed at poisoning the minds of our children? That’s out the window now. Today the happenings of consenting adults in their own bedrooms are taught to children in elementary schools. In public libraries throughout the country, a special “story hour” is now hosted by men in dresses who tell toddlers about gender diversity and all the wonders that become possible once biology and reproduction cease to play any part in our discussions on such subjects. Even the new face of the Democrat Party, Alexandria Ocasio Cortez, a wonderfully diverse woman whose ancestors fled the Spanish inquisition for Puerto Rico generations ago, recently participated in an online fundraiser for children who might be interested in switching restrooms at some point. They raised over $340,000 in the process, you might be interested to know.

I have a question for the parents in the audience. Would you rather your child smoke marijuana, or begin taking hormones which will sterilize them before they are old enough to understand the implications of such a course?

Trick question. Now they’re going to do both, and if you don’t like it, the Democrats will send CPS to take your babies away.

Now some questions for the libertarians. Surely you share my disgust for CPS breaking up families, right? Surely you agree that parents have a right to make medical decisions for their pre-adolescent children, right? If so, would it not be better if we had stopped this insanity a dozen steps ago in the process?

All of this could have been prevented if, when somebody told us “It’s none of your business what consenting adults do in the privacy of their own bedrooms!” We shouted back “Yes, actually, it is our business”. As a society, we could stand up and say, “We have standards, and if some number of our people do not meet those standards, then we have all the sympathy in the world for them, but we are not going to change the standards and sterilize our children to accommodate for those failures.”

The Left understands this, and if the Right hopes to save any remnant of our society, we’ll have to figure it out too.

Look at this recent mess with the boys from the Covington Catholic school. Fox News and others have been celebrating how the scam got so completely exposed as a total fraud, and we should be happy that the Left got caught in one of the countless such lies they tell each day. But too many of our friends in the conservative media seem to miss the broader strategy at work.

It turns out this supposed Native American Activist, Mr. Philips, was not in fact, a Vietnam veteran. Similarly to Democrat Senator Richard Blumenthal, Mr. Philips was enlisted during the time of the war, but never actually deployed, yet this did not stop lying Leftists from calling him a war hero to further their narrative. I would also be interested to know what tribe the surname “Philips” hails from, if anybody wants to call in and tell me.

It turns out the only people hurling racial epithets were the so called “Black Hebrew Israelites” whom the Southern Poverty Law Center has designated a hate group, not that I usually find such designations helpful. They said things so disgusting to these young boys that I will not burden the listener with such filth.

Far from being a bunch of marauding Nazis looking for a fight, the boys were waiting for a bus to pick them up when they were confronted by these savages. No chants of “Build the Wall” were forthcoming, contradicting the story Mr. Philips told the Leftist media.

Once all of this was exposed, some commentators who had previously called for the assault and execution of these kids, quietly deleted their tweets. Some apologized, others doubled down anyway.

The expectation now is to move onto the next ridiculous race baiting lie the Leftist media infects our national discourse with, in the hopes that they’ll get away with it like they did in August of 2017 and countless other times. And of course, the so called conservative media will let them, because they would not want to risk being criticized or losing ad revenues.

Anybody who thinks this was a win for the Right missed the point. The Left terrorized these children and their families. So great was the terror, that their school closed for a day due to threats of violence. The Left specializes in this sort of terrorism, and getting caught in the act does not matter because the goal is to strike fear into the hearts of their opponents, and in this they have succeeded. Anybody who had paid the slightest bit of attention to all the so-called Nazi punching these black clad anarchists have been doing in the last sixteen months would understand this perfectly, but lord have mercy on the career of the man who was seen as siding with anyone accused of being a Nazi, no matter how much video evidence there is to back up the claim.

The Left does not wait until the supposed horrors of fascism actually arrive before they break out into hysterics. Were they to do that, they would never have the opportunity to riot. They find the first tiny spark of opposition to their hegemony, and they throw everything they’ve got at it. They analyze demographic trends, and set out to destroy entire categories of human beings before any of those people have any opportunity to even understand the conflict. With each social and political success they accomplish, they create new and increasingly bizarre categories of protected persons and behaviors to justify their violence and deception. When no opposition is present, they attack innocent bystanders, just to keep the population afraid of their wrath.

The Left hated those kids for the color of their skin, their religious beliefs, and their hats. That’s why the fake Vietnam Vet and the black supremacists accosted them in the first place. That’s why the video was deceptively edited. That’s why the mainstream media promoted this lie. That’s why social media erupted with threats of violence, and why the same social media companies who have been censoring conservatives for so called hate speech, allowed the calumnies and terrorism to go unchecked on their platforms.

Remember how they told us it was a mortal sin to criticize these Parkland kids for their political activism? As they went from coast to coast trying to drum up support for gun grabs, staged protests, and attacked conservative voices, we were told only a monster would dare mention them. But threatening to lock these kids in their school and burn it down was the pinnacle of human virtue because they were on the wrong team.

The Left won the culture war, which I ought to note is the prelude to the martial conflict, because they recognize better than anyone, that it really is all about the children. They destroy the children who might someday grow up to oppose them. Preferably they prevent the kids from being conceived at all, and in the unfortunate event of conception, they always have Planned Parenthood. Should these obstacles to their agenda survive to birth, they poison their minds in the public schools. Should the parents be fortunate enough to be able to afford a private education, they use the media to gin up the mob in the hopes of ending their lives before adulthood.

Those who witness these horrors learn their lesson, and dare not step out of line. I recently had a conversation with a man who was afraid to have children of his own, for fear that they might suffer the ordeals we’re discussing. When that takes its predictable toll and birthrates plummet, do they stop? Of course not, they never do.

They just bring in a whole new population to be enslaved upon our ashes, and they’ll keep doing this until the end of time. That is, unless somebody like you stops them.

Want to share this on Facebook or with polite company? Share it from OutlawConservative.com!

So welcome to the ranks of the Restless Right, fellow Outlaws. I hope you enjoy the show, and I invite you to join us for the live broadcast, this and every Wednesday from 5-7pm US Eastern time.  808-4-OUTLAW if you would like to chime in, and it would be my honor to speak with you today.

The recording of the live show will be uploaded to OutlawConservative.com after air time.

You can also listen live on the Radical Agendas Radio Network. Catch video on demand on our Bitchute channel!

The players on this site now have 24/7/365 streaming content!

You can always listen to live Radical Agenda episodes at

https://ChristopherCantwell.com/live

This production is made possible by the financial support of listeners and readers like you. I literally cannot do this without you. I sell shirts, hats, mousepads, and other cool stuff, though sadly, we can only accept cryptocurrency. Or you can just fork over money by donating.

Podcast: Play in new window | Download

Subscribe: Apple Podcasts | Android | RSS