I’m not a Christian. Mom tried to do the Catholic thing. Didn’t take.

I spent a lot of years as one of these obnoxiously hostile atheists. I had every anti-religion cliche down pat. I would see news stories about declining religious affiliations, and celebrate mankind’s slow crawl from the dark days of superstition.

Then I became a libertarian, and ultimately, an anarchist. I found so much overlap between the two ideas (or lack thereof, perhaps), that I thought I finally had it all figured out. I thought I was smarter than everybody, and of course, I was, but not for the reasons I had imagined.

Interestingly, it didn’t make me any happier to have these supposed answers. This, I theorized, was because the world around me, and all the people in it, were still stuck in the darkness of superstition. It has been said after all, that it is no measure of mental health to be well adjusted to a profoundly sick society.

In recent years, I found my political ideas changing. As the world began to drift away from religion, and away from the order the State imposed, I was shocked to find that matters had not improved. I saw riots become commonplace, violence escalate, sex become less satisfying, and drugs become more painful than magical. Whereas I had once sought only freedom, peace, gratification, and novelty, I now wanted order, meaning, connection, and stability.

During one profoundly dark moment of my own, one which nearly killed me, I got an email from the person who was the subject of that night’s depressive episode. Prior to the tragic dissolution of our romance, she and I had contemplated joining a church for the sake of the children we were planning to have. I was excited by the idea. I thought it would be nice to have that sense of community which I had lost so long ago. I thought it would be helpful in raising our children to be upright and decent people. I romanticized the traditions, and looked forward to reconnecting with an important part of the history of my people.

But strictly speaking, I was no less an atheist. I didn’t believe Christ died for my sins. I didn’t believe that any omnipotent, omniscient, force was guiding mankind, and if one was, he was doing a very poor job, it seemed.

The email I mentioned, contained a link to a video of Jordan Peterson. It was a lengthy interview where he talked about Myth, Truth, Science, and Religion, and it was my first introduction to this now notorious figure of the Alt Lite, or the so called “Intellectual Dark Web”. People raise legitimate concerns about Dr. Peterson, I am aware of these things, and I am not holding him up as a god here, but we’ll spend some time talking about his words, because they are insightful for the purposes of today’s message.

I didn’t watch it at the time, because I was too busy trying to work up the nerve to end my life. I failed, again, sadly, and after a few days of recovery I decided to give it my attention.

He had a very interesting take on Christianity, which ran contrary to my prior atheistic conceptions of it.

For most of my life I had conceptualized all religions as beginning and ending with intentional deception. A giant scam to compel obedience and control the behavior of its unwitting dupes. One which had led to senseless wars, economic catastrophe, torture, rape, and any other social ill one might see fit to add to such a list.

Peterson saw it as pretty much the exact opposite. Truth was the whole entire point of the belief system. I found this to be bizarre, given my long held beliefs, but his manner of speaking made me certain of his superior intelligence, and I was desperate for some comfort, given my recent effort to check on this supposed afterlife. So I listened intently as he explained…

Now, Christianity really starts to play around with exactly what the hell the soul is. And they, you know, the ideas come out in very bizarre ways. And like, one of the most bizarre ways is that Christianity makes the assumption that the word of God that pulls order out of chaos at the beginning of time — so logos– is the thing that’s Christ, you know, so many eons later. They’re the same things.

It’s like, what the hell does that mean?

Well, it’s like, if you embody the immortal soul properly, you’re the thing that generates order from chaos, or sometimes the reverse. You make– you know, you’re the transforming agent that sits at the middle of order and chaos. 

And the Christians figure out that this logos thing is very much associated with articulated truth, articulated truth. 

But one of the things that Jung recognized was that the core doctrine of Christianity, in some sense, is the truth buttresses you most thoroughly against the vicissitudes of being. That’s your salvation, the truth, the spoken truth.

It’s not– So you might say, well, people say– Christians say, well, if you believe in Christ you’re saved. Well, what do you mean by belief exactly? You say Jesus Christ is the Son of God. And you say, I believe that. Just because you say that, doesn’t mean you believe it at all. It has almost no bearing on what you believe. The question is, how do you act? And the fundamental question that’s under all that is, is your speech true? Now, then you might ask well, what does true mean? Well, and the answer to that would be twofold. What are you trying to do with your speech?

There’s two things you can do with it. One is you can manipulate reality so that it does what you want it to do. And that’s the sort of speech that people use when they’re trying to get what they want. The problem with that is that there’s no way that they can actually know what they want. They just hypothesize what it is that they want based on some theory, and then they try to manipulate the world so that they get that. But it’s an unsatisfying venture. And often, when they do get it, it’s not good anyways. So it involves a kind of falsity of speech.

The other way is to try to say what you mean and think and perceive as clearly as you possibly can, always, and see what happens. Now, the story that underlies Christianity– and it’s not only Christianity, but it’s Christianity that I’m most familiar with– is that. The rule is live in accordance with the truth and see what happens. So in the Sermon on the Mount, for example, Christ basically says– set your sights on allegiance to God. It’s like, whatever the highest value is, we’ll say. And act in a manner that’s concordant with that. So that’s your goal. Then pay attention to it here and now, your best strategy for the future.

Then you might say, well, prove that. Well, that that’s when the question starts to become existential. It’s like, well, you can’t prove it. You have to try it.

That’s like Kierkegaard’s leap of faith. You cannot tell if this works unless you do it. And that’s a commitment.

It’s like, those two ways of being, like the manipulative way of being. That’s an adversarial way of being archetypally. It’s Manipulative It’s got the lie at its core. That’s completely different than this path. So it’s a hypothesis. Well, it’s a hypothesis that Jung did a good job of elaborating, although you know, even with Jung it’s not fully articulated. He’s still saturated in image to a large degree. But no wonder– it’s very complicated to make this sort of thing fully articulated.

You read Solzhenitsyn. You think, OK, why did the Soviet Union become the absolute hellhole that it was? Solzhenitsyn says because everyone lied. It’s like, oh, isn’t that interesting? Well, that isn’t a hypothesis that you hear every day.

So then you think about Freud, and you think, well, what’s the major cause of mental illness? Repression. Well, that’s a lie, fundamentally. I mean, Freud’s played around with it to some degree. So it’s sort of like, it’s more like lying by omission actually than lying by commission. But it doesn’t matter. It’s still lying.

Jung says the same thing. It’s like, oh, well, wouldn’t it be interesting if the fundamental root of psychopathology was the lie, the fundamental root of political psychopathology is the lie. It’s like, well, what if that’s what’s demolishing your life? People say, well, people think– especially when they’re nihilistic and they become destructive– that the universe is sort of– it’s an unfair and arbitrary place and it’s basically bent on their random destruction while they suffer. It’s something like that. Yeah. Right. OK. What do you do under those circumstances? That’s the question.

Well, one potential answer is twist the thing so that you can maybe get what you hypothetically want out of it. The other is rely on your perceptions and your capacity for accurate representation. Communicate that. And take your chances. It’s like, who’s right? Well, that’s the battle between good and evil. Who’s right? It’s a continual battle.

Now, I am certain that there are Christians in the audience who are screaming at their devices with complaints of misinterpretation. I was a guest on a libertarian production over the weekend called Questioning Authority, which is definitely worth listening to, if you haven’t already. The host is a Christian, and he objected to my brief summation of this by saying it is not a works based salvation. Take from it what you will, but that’s beyond the scope of what I mean to communicate today.

I mentioned at the beginning that my mother tried her best to raise my brother and I as Catholics. She compelled us to go to church, and a religious study class two days a week. Like I said, it didn’t take. I later found myself in jail, where I spent my 20th birthday, perhaps as a result of that failure.

In jail, I decided to read the bible, cover to cover. I had enough time on my hands, but I found it tedious. I went to church during that stint, and didn’t find much more inspiration there, especially when I realized that most of the inmates in attendance just used it as another avenue to traffic in contraband.

But Peterson’s interpretation spoke to me. The verbal talents which make this production possible have obviously been refined a great deal over the years, but I was not unaware of them in my youth. I could always talk circles around people, and usually outsmart them. Since I saw religion and so much else of the world as fundamentally dishonest things, it didn’t seem like such a problem to lie and cheat. So I would use these talents manipulatively to get what I thought I wanted, which was usually drugs and sex.

Perhaps unsurprisingly, this led me to tremendous suffering, and the worst sort of suffering at that. I’ve suffered more recently to be sure, but I felt a certain redemptive quality to those hardships which dulled the sting. I could not say the same, for the horrors I saw in my youth.

Upon my release from the custody of the Suffolk County Corrections system, I couldn’t say I had learned much, and I certainly hadn’t had any sort of religious awakening. I knew I didn’t want to go back to jail though, so even when I did run afoul of the law, which was not uncommon, I did what I could to avoid creating complaining witnesses. I was no poster child for sobriety to be certain, but I abandoned some of the more troublesome and expensive drug habits which had led me to my worst behaviors.

Alcohol, you may have heard, is legal though, and we got better acquainted. I don’t mean to sing the praises of such a caustic substance, but I will credit it with teaching me something important during that time. As I became a more habitual drinker, I found it extremely difficult to keep track of lies. I would blurt out whatever came to my mind, and manipulating people proved more difficult as drinking became a daily habit.

The booze was surely taking a very costly toll on my body and mind, but it was during this time that I attempted to adopt a policy I’d later come to understand as radical honesty. I made a lot of mistakes, I lost a lot of friends, and I ultimately ended up back in jail, this time for drinking and driving, but the one benefit I did get out of this was that the relationships I had which could tolerate my alcoholism were more meaningful and satisfying. People rightly saw me as a flawed individual prone to mistakes, but they knew I was honest, and this made me easier to forgive.

Upon my second release from jail, I tried with limited success to moderate my drinking. I kept the lesson of radical honesty, though. I had discovered libertarianism while studying for my legal defense, and while that school of thought has its flaws, it did lead me to contemplate morality in a way my religious studies never managed to. For the first time, I cared about being righteous.

I found a sort of power in this. I became an activist, and met a lot of truly amazing people. I started a YouTube channel, and later, a blog. Libertarianism, you might say, occupied the space in my mind where religion usually resides. I was an ideologue, and a passionate one at that. I found a better outlet for my talents, in advocating for political and social change.

During that philosophical journey, I found many of my fellow activists to be corrupt and dishonest people. They attacked me relentlessly, and many of these attacks were lacking in merit. This impacted me in many ways, but I refused to change course because popularity wasn’t my goal. I was in search of truth and righteousness.

I was frustrated with my lack of recognition in comparison to so many people I saw as fundamentally corrupt, but as I stubbornly adhered to my course, I slowly but surely built up a base of what could only be described as fanatical support. While others made money through traffic volume and advertising revenue, I found people who believed in me and were willing to make regular contributions to finance my writing and video production.

As time went forward, I watched some of my adversaries get exposed as frauds. Others found more lucrative movements to involve themselves in, and began to advocate for different ideas. I simply continued saying what I perceived to be the truth, and as the days, weeks, months, and years passed by, I gained more support and more financial rewards for my efforts.

I’ll stop short of making this an autobiography, and just say that as I watched the video of Peterson explaining his conceptualization of Christianity, I realized that I had at some point decided to follow the path he described. I said what I believed to be true, even in the face of adversity, and though I suffered, I always managed to find a path forward. Though far from luxurious, this path was far more tolerable than the hell I had created by trying to speak and act manipulatively.

Many of the ideas I had espoused were deeply flawed, to be sure. They had to be revised over time, and through trial end error, listening, reading, and other experiences, I did revise them. I continued to say what I perceived to be true, even if I had to contradict something I had previously said. This was tumultuous at times, but sustainable, and spiritually rewarding.

I lacked words to describe it at the time, but not long ago I heard Jared Howe of So To Speak, proudly syndicated at ChristopherCantwell.com, describe himself a “cultural Christian”. When he said it, that clicked in my mind immediately. “That’s it”, I thought. I might have trouble contorting my worldview to believe in the historical accuracy of Christianity’s religious texts, but I had adopted their forms, and my satisfaction with life improved dramatically as a result.

I found myself in jail once again in 2017, this time in Virginia. While there, I read a book by Rodney Stark titled “God’s Battalions: The Case for the Crusades”. I’m not sure who sent it to me, but if you’re listening, thank you. “The Crusades” is one of these ridiculous memes the atheists so frequently use to demonize Christians. As I read the book, and learned about the many aggressions the Christians had suffered before finally rising up to fight back the Muslim hordes, I became disgusted by so many of the obnoxious words which had previously fallen from my ignorant mouth.

Another book by the same author was likewise sent to me by one of you. It was titled “How The West Won” and I was amazed by how central to our civilization the Catholic Church had been. In particular, the Catholic theologians, and their devotion to science really stood out to me. I always thought of Christianity, and all other religions, as being fundamentally anti-Science, but put against the backdrop of what I had learned from Jordan Peterson, this made a great deal of sense to me, now that the scales had fallen from my eyes.

I also read a great deal about the Jews while I was in jail. It turns out, they didn’t have the same devotion to the truth as the Christians. That seemed to stand in stark contrast to the myth of “Judeo Christian” culture which dominates so much of our discourse today. Many conservatives had rightly pointed out the incompatibility of Christianity and Islam, and that seems too obvious to need explaining today, but those same conservatives would repeat this “Judeo Christian” phrasing so often, and as I learned more about the Jews I came to hear this as “False Truth”.

Jews were not just people of the Old Testament who hadn’t bothered to read the next chapter. They had a rather lengthy continuation of their religious teachings called the Talmud, and in this text, lying was explicitly endorsed, repeatedly. Jesus was not just denied, but mocked and reviled. Boiled in excrement, as it were. To them, Mary was no virgin, but rather, a whore.

Judeo Christian, indeed. Even as a sin soaked infidel in desperate need of a lengthy confession, I figure I must be more of a Christian than anybody who repeats that revolting phrase.

Through these revelations, so many things came into focus. Jews pushed for separation of church and state, abortion, birth control, homosexuality, the eradication of Christian symbols from all of our society. The Jewish press demonized religious people and institutions. They relentlessly undermined the institution of marriage in so many ways. The hostility came to dwarf that of the “racism” we whites were so often falsely accused of. Their latest assault, transgenderism, makes a mockery of not only religion, but even the most primitive understandings of science.

Why?

Another thoughtful explanation is provided by Peterson in the same video.

You could say that the image of Christ is the West’s attempt to most accurately represent the path of being that constitutes success across an infinite set of dominance hierarchies. That’s essentially– or that’s it that’s at least one way of looking at it. Now, there are figures– hero figures, you know– because Christ is like a hero, but he’s sort of a meta hero, right? He’s the amalgam of many, many, many, many heroes. But the hero has key attributes. Like the hero, for example, is always encountering chaos and defeating it. Well, that’s the human path.

You know, we encounter chaos. It’s often a snake. Well, that also points to its deep evolutionary roots.

So there’s a anthropologist, Lynne Isbell, who wrote a book a while back called The Tree The Serpent In Vision– I think I’ve got that right. And she was interested in why human beings can see so well. Because we can see really well. The only things that can see better than us are birds of prey. And she thought, well, why would a primate like us have such good vision? So she went around the world. She thought– she knew also that we were particularly good at detecting the kind of camouflage patterns that characterize snakes, especially in the lower half of our visual field. And she was kind of curious about that. And then she thought, well, you know, maybe we were preyed upon by snakes. And you know, maybe we had to develop that vision because we were preyed upon by snakes, like, you know, 60 million years ago, way back when we weren’t even people, which is about how old snakes are. It’s like 60 million years or something like that.

So then she went around the world and she correlated the acuity of primate vision with the prevalence of predatory snakes. It’s like, nice correlation. So she thought oh, human beings and snakes co-evolved. Well, so what gives you vision? Snakes. That’s what it says in Genesis.

What else gives you vision? Fruit. That’s also right. That’s why we have color vision. Right? What makes you self-conscious if you’re a man? Women. Right? That’s Eve. So you know, the stories in the Bible, the pre-flood stories, they are really old. We have no idea how old they are. And like they’re extremely old. And you might say, well, in story form, well, like, actual story form– god only knows how well they are– but in terms of behavioral pattern, they could easily be 60 million years old.

It’s like, the thing that defeats the snake gets the women. And you imagine that in tree dwelling primates, say. Well, up comes the snakes. It’s like, the first guy who figured out how to drop a stick on a snake, he was very popular.

So you know, so the snake what’s happened is that religion– so what’s happened as far as I can tell is that the systems that our brain evolved to detect basically rapacious predators. It’s not just snakes, but it be like reptiles with teeth, predators in the dark, things under the water, like crocodiles. That’s like– that’s the lurking anomaly, right? It’s the thing you have to contend with. And it’s actually a monster. People say monsters aren’t real. It’s like, it depends on your time frame. If you add up and average all the predatory monsters across 60 million years, you get a monster. OK. So the amalgam of monster is a representation of the class of predatory stimuli. That might be a way of looking at it.

So we’re very sensitive to that because we were prey animals. OK, then our cortex leapt up our level of abstraction. So then that same system started to detect anomaly as such. It wasn’t just the predatory thing that was outside the dominance hierarchy. It was the abstract thing that was outside the system of ideas. It’s the same thing. And so that became symbolized by the chaos monster.

And we can easily throw that on our enemies. It’s like, well, who are you? You’re outside the hierarchy. Oh, you’re a chaos monster. Well, yes you are. That’s not a arbitrary prejudice. It’s like, you are absolutely a chaos monster. Then the question is what do you do with chaos monsters. One answer is kill them. The other answer is get their gold. That’s a better answer. Because there’s information in chaos. And we’re information scavengers. And that’s our niche. It’s like, outside what we know, there’s information. You might die retrieving it. But if you don’t die, you’re like a major hero. Yeah. That’s right.

Described this way, Christianity is not mere story telling. It describes, in a sense, our survival mechanisms. Perhaps more than that, our advancements, not only culturally, but genetically, right down to our vision, and our ability to detect predators.

The people who attack our religious symbols and institutions, primarily Jews and their pawns, they always feed us this nonsense about being inclusive. Interesting theory. We often reject this, and for good reason, but there is an element of truth to it. They don’t want you to recognize things as being outside the hierarchy. In fact, they don’t want you to have a hierarchy, hence the communism and other egalitarian nonsense. They don’t want you to recognize, the chaos monster, the other, the predator, the enemy.

They are not telling you to move beyond superstition and advance, they are undermining your most primitive survival instincts,

They don’t want you to emulate the hero archetype that succeeds across the myriad dominance hierarchies. They want you to fail, they want you to die, they want you to stop reproducing yourselves, until there are none of you left.

They don’t do this by undermining facts, that’s too difficult. Instead, they undermine our stories.

I’m made to recall a piece from Vice News which I recently referenced in a prior episode, about Natalie Wynn of Contrapoints. Wynn is a transgender YouTuber who aims to “de-radicalize young, right wing men”.

Elle Reeve says to Wynn, “What makes your videos unique is that you are not obsessed with fact-checking every lie told by the President, or by a white supremacist, or a misogynist. That you look at the arguments undergirding their ideas and try to unpack those. Why did you decide to do that?

Wynn responds “Facts don’t matter to people as much as people think they do. People don’t believe because of facts and evidence. They believe things because they’re part of a story that they tell themselves, and so I guess part of what I’m doing is understanding those stories, and understanding psychologically, why are these stories being told?”

Reeve adds in post production: “Who sees themselves as the most rational guys in the room? Often, young white guys. Her primary targets”

Now, you might initially say that it would make sense that a tranny would not care much for facts. Facts are rather inconvenient to such types, after all. But this is a lesson we could afford to learn.

People don’t believe things because of facts. How many times have you laid out absolutely unassailable facts and evidence only to see the person you took the time to educate roll their eyes and cling to some story far more superstitious than anything the bible has to offer? I know I’ve wasted a lot of breath and keystrokes in this fashion. If facts mattered, James Fields would be free.

What this freak said about stories is absolutely true, and that speaks to the success Christianity had for so long. If you tried to explain the benefits of living a truthful life to most people they may or may not have the intellect to understand you, but if you give them a character, and a compelling story, and encourage them to emulate the character, this seems to fit better with the psyche of most people.

Likewise, if you wanted to destroy a people of truth and righteousness, it would not do you much good to tell them to be dishonest and wicked. Rather, you would flood their culture with stories that glorified degeneracy, crime, and deception.

While doing so, you would likely meet a great deal of resistance though. The people who had learned to embody courage, and truth, and decency from an older, better story, would speak out against what you were doing. They might even try to run out of the temple, or worse.

So to fully accomplish your aims, you would also have to exterminate any cultural reference to the archetypal character of their story.

You see that every day. Perhaps, like me, you participated in, and celebrated such efforts. Hopefully you too, see the folly of that today.

Something that really stood out to me this weekend, was how the media and politicians covered a series of terrorist attacks against Christian churches in Sri Lanka on Easter Sunday.

Recall that when Robert Bowers killed 11 Jews in a synagogue in Pittsburgh, the entire world seemed to rise and scream in a unified voice against the supposed evils of “anti-Semitism”. The President of the United States called it poison, and called on Americans to destroy those who wanted to destroy the Jewish people.

Recall that when Brenton Tarrant killed 50 people and injured 50 others by shooting up a mosque in New Zealand, the whole world was again mobilized against the “international terrorist threat” of White Nationalism. New Zealand’s female prime minister wore a hijab, and disarmed her countrymen, in the name of the attack. Barack Obama tweeted his support for the “Muslim community” and called on people the world over to stand against hatred.

Yet, when Muslim terrorists cause nine explosions at multiple churches, hotels and other locations in Sri Lanka on Easter Sunday, killing nearly 300 people and injuring hundreds more, the response was much more muted. President Trump did not call on Americans to destroy those who wanted to destroy Christians, only that “The United States offers heartfelt condolences to the great people of Sri Lanka.” Barack Obama did not express his solidarity with the Christian community, only the “tourists and Easter worshippers” who were attacked.

Ah yes, Easter worshippers. Praise our dear Lord Mr. Easter, and all of his bunnies with their cream filled chocolate eggs which we’ve stashed in the bushes for the children to find. Perhaps we can rename Notre Dame when it is rebuilt, as the Easter and Passover worshipping center, and this Christmas as we worship Santa Clause, we can try to remember the name of the country where this massacre took place. Or not, whatever.

I tried to go back to church in 2017, not long before Charlottesville. I was dating a girl who lived in Maryland at the time. I hadn’t been to church in years, but I had felt a calling to ever since I had discussed it with the love interest I had mentioned earlier. I was excited as we parked the car. I started sweating a little bit if I’m honest with you, and not because of the weather.

We went inside. Sat down in the second row of pews. I felt this flurry of emotions which I really don’t know how to describe, honestly.

When the pastor came out, he was a black man. He spoke with such a thick foreign accent that I could barely understand what the hell he was saying.

That feeling I can describe, using a very recent reference.

It felt a lot like watching Notre Dame burn…

 

Join us this and every Monday, and Friday from 5-7pm Eastern, for another exciting episode of the Radical Agenda. It’s a show about timeless ideas, the news of the day, and whatever is on your mind at  323-9-AGENDA

You can listen live on the Radical Agendas Radio Network. Catch video on demand on our Bitchute channel!

The players on this site now have 24/7/365 streaming content!

You can always listen to live Radical Agenda episodes at

https://ChristopherCantwell.com/live

I NEED MONEY!

[mcc_donations alignment=”center” currencies=”” primary_currency=”BTC” show_currencies_as_icons=”1″ show_currencies_as_select=”1″ show_currency_as_text=”1″ show_address=”1″ qr_code_enabled=”1″ qr_code_max_width=”180″]

This production is made possible by the financial support of listeners and readers like you. I literally cannot do this without you. I sell shirts, hats, mousepads, and other cool stuff, though sadly, we can only accept cryptocurrency. Or you can just fork over money by donating.

Become an OutlawConservative.com Premium Member!

Shop At EdgyGoodies.com!

 

Podcast: Play in new window | Download

Subscribe: Android | RSS

It’s good to be back. You might have heard I needed to take a little time off, but clown world takes no breaks, and duty calls.

There’s a lot going on. Notre Dame burned, and there is ABSOLUTELY NOTHING SUSPICIOUS ABOUT THAT. If you think this has anything to do with the Jews and their Gentile dupes trying to destroy every last relic of Christian European history, then you are a racist conspiracy nut who probably listens to shit like the Radical Agenda!

An open homosexual named Booty Judge announced his candidacy for President of the United States. Democrat, as you’ve probably guessed. He would also be the youngest president in American History, so he and his so called “husband” will make fine role models for all the young goyim who have yet to decide if they want to be genetic dead ends, and dump the last of their family’s DNA in the shit pipes of other degenerates.

If you thought Booty Judge’s last name was funny, get this… His butt buddy’s name is Chasten. Chasten Booty Judge. I suppose we now know who the top in that relationship is… Or do we?

I guess we’ll have to wait for the debates to find out, and I’m not even just making a homophobic joke here. I think that’s hugely relevant. I mean, if we’re going to have a fag president, I’d honestly feel a lot better about it if he was a top.

Now, for those of you who don’t have libertarian degenerate friends, I should probably explain what I’m talking about here. Like, gay dudes are not egalitarians, fundamentally. They got top and bottom, big spoon little spoon, pitcher catcher. You follow? Sure some of them are switch hitters, or versatile or whatever, but generally speaking there are people who make deposits and people who receive them. I’m not endorsing this shit, I’m just telling you how it works.

With that in mind, you gotta choose between the two as President, I think you’ll agree that a fudge packer is better than a pillow biter. I mean, sure he’s got no investment in the future beyond the horizon of his own existence, but I just feel like he’d be a lot better at protecting America’s interests if he was the type of guy to grab another dude by the hair and test his gag reflexes, than if he was the type to pull his panties to one side and bend over the arm of the couch, whimpering with anticipation.

You might think I’m splitting hairs here, but this is deadly serious. Who would the Chinese be more likely to declare war against? The guy in the facial abuse video who was standing there at the end, spitting on the recipient’s face and saying “Thanks you stupid whore!” or the guy who was laying the floor afterwards, not sure where the snot ends and the mascara begins? It would certainly be a lot more comforting to hear about how President Booty Judge was doing in the polls, than to hear about how the poles were doing in President Booty Judge. Don’t you think?

You might assume that a guy who would become mayor and seek the Presidency would be naturally dominant and thus a top. You might say the same thing for him giving the other guy his last name, but you must have forgotten that he is a Democrat. These people are all about upending the power structures of our society. If we had nothing but gay top presidents for the next six presidential terms, the Left would be in absolute hysterics talking about top privilege, and demanding that the next President be some size queen ass gaping queer porn celebrity.

Now I’m not saying I’d endorse the guy if I found out he was pitching instead of catching. But these are the kinds of decisions we’re going to be making once immigration turns America permanently blue. I mean, think about it, do you want a straight female negress, or a gay white male? Don’t go all ancap on me and reject the system, this is the world you’re going to live in soon. Whether the fag was a top or a bottom might be the deciding factor in your vote come 2024, so you need to learn this stuff.

 

Join us this and every Monday, and Friday from 5-7pm Eastern, for another exciting episode of the Radical Agenda. It’s a show about timeless ideas, the news of the day, and whatever is on your mind at  323-9-AGENDA

You can listen live on the Radical Agendas Radio Network. Catch video on demand on our Bitchute channel!

The players on this site now have 24/7/365 streaming content!

You can always listen to live Radical Agenda episodes at

https://ChristopherCantwell.com/live

 

This production is made possible by the financial support of listeners and readers like you. I literally cannot do this without you. I sell shirts, hats, mousepads, and other cool stuff, though sadly, we can only accept cryptocurrency. Or you can just fork over money by donating.

Shop At EdgyGoodies.com!

 

Podcast: Play in new window | Download

Subscribe: Android | RSS

Mark Zuckerberg is calling on the governments of the world to help regulate the Internet in the hopes of, amongst other things, eliminating “harmful content”. Writing in the Washington Post, the Facebook CEO says “Lawmakers often tell me we have too much power over speech, and frankly I agree. I’ve come to believe that we shouldn’t make so many important decisions about speech on our own.”

Zuckerberg goes on to state that for this reason, Facebook is creating an “independent body” from which people can appeal Facebook’s content moderation decisions. How a body created by Facebook is supposed to be “independent” of Facebook, he leaves to the reader’s imagination. To alleviate our concerns, however, he assures us that Facebook is working with the French government, to decide what should and should not be allowed on the Internet here in the United States.

Zuckerberg complains that Facebook’s job in determining what can and cannot be said, is far to difficult “when people use dozens of different sharing services”. He suggests “a more standardized approach” whereby governments throughout the world get to abuse the same power that Facebook acknowledges abusing today. He rapidly moves on from here to discussing election interference, telling the reader how Facebook decides not only what can and cannot be said, but who can and cannot say it, as well.

There are plenty of examples out there of what Facebook and the other big tech companies have deemed “harmful content,” as well as absolutely horrific content which they’ve considered protected.

Antifa terrorism, that’s fine. Pushing transgenderism on children? That’s fine too.

A homeland for Whites? That’s hate speech. A homeland for Jews? That’s fine of course, but criticizing it is anti-Semitic hate speech, goyim.

But it’s not just race and gender that big tech wants to hide the truth about. They are wholly dedicated to keeping people from finding out the truth about abortion too. Facebook blocked advertisements for a movie about Roe vs. Wade because, “the ads involve advocacy for an issue of national importance.”

Twitter banned, then unbanned, the account for the movie “Unplanned” on it’s opening weekend. They claim this was a “glitch” which also caused them to lose upwards of 50,000 followers for some unexplained reason. Even the movie’s starring actress said “I can’t even follow the Twitter account for my own film. It keeps kicking me off.” Major TV networks refused to air advertisements for the movie as well. Despite an undeserved R Rating by the MPAA and a blackout by mainstream and social media platforms, the movie beat expectations, bringing in over $6.1 Million during its opening weekend.

This obviously runs a major risk for Facebook that Zuckerberg intentionally fails to mention in his op-ed. When Facebook runs around trying to make the Internet safe for Jews and hostile to truth, competitors are bound to emerge, and the next one might be more competent than Gab’s Andrew Torba. If Facebook’s absurd standards of “hate speech” and “terrorist propaganda” and other “harmful content” are met with competition from a reasonably capable and well financed group of Gentiles, all of their censorship will have proven useless. Facebook will fade into obscurity, Zuckerberg will be broke, and the Jews will be fucked anyway, when the goyim figure out how badly they’ve been getting screwed.

The answer, obviously, is to impose the standards of Silicon Valley Leftists on the entire planet, through the force of the State. Once the government decides who can and cannot be heard, and what can and cannot be said, their hegemony over the public discourse will be solidified. Which of course, is why Elizabeth Warren is so glad to see Zuckerberg inviting her to censor the Internet.

Join us this and every Monday, and Friday from 5-7pm Eastern, for another exciting episode of the Radical Agenda. It’s a show about timeless ideas, the news of the day, and whatever is on your mind at  323-9-AGENDA

You can listen live on the Radical Agendas Radio Network. Catch video on demand on our Bitchute channel!

The players on this site now have 24/7/365 streaming content!

You can always listen to live Radical Agenda episodes at

https://ChristopherCantwell.com/live

This production is made possible by the financial support of listeners and readers like you. I literally cannot do this without you. I sell shirts, hats, mousepads, and other cool stuff, though sadly, we can only accept cryptocurrency. Or you can just fork over money by donating.

Shop At EdgyGoodies.com!

 

Podcast: Play in new window | Download

Subscribe: Android | RSS

You might have heard, I’m not a big fan of Democrats. Republicans have their own problems of course, but my complaints about them tend to be disappointments in their failures. Democrats make me fear for the future of humanity, when they succeed. If only we could magically swap the success:failure ratios of the two parties, America would be quite the paradise.

People in our circles are understandably feeling some sense of urgency, as the immigration timebomb ticks loudly toward White minority, and the President seems more interested in Israeli territorial expansion, than American territorial sovereignty. That sense of impending doom has spawned a range of different ideas, which might charitably be described as varying in coherence.

I was less than shocked to see some former Trump supporters embrace Democratic candidates. The boomers had to eventually get something right, and finding out the Nazis were indeed socialists was surely a much welcomed relief to them after losing so many arguments. A lot of these people turned out to be disreputable, so voting Democrat would seem to fit with that theme. Others just want chaos and destruction, which in my view, voting Democrat is sure to accomplish.

So when the #YangGang2020 thing popped up, I dismissed most of these people as idiots, subversives, and crazy people. An Asian man handing out a thousand bucks a month? The jokes write themselves, obviously, and I love a good joke, but God Emperor Trump was a joke too, until he became President of the United States. It took a couple of years for us to conclude that he was still a joke, and an unfunny one at that.

Then I saw Hunter Wallace from OccidentalDissent.com picking up on this meme. I had to take a shower and double check to make sure I hadn’t lost my mind. Hunter seems one of the sounder minds in this thing, so I couldn’t dismiss him as a malevolent actor or sucker.

He joins us today to discuss The 15 Points of 3.0.

Join us this and every Monday, and Friday from 5-7pm Eastern, for another exciting episode of the Radical Agenda. It’s a show about timeless ideas, the news of the day, and whatever is on your mind at  323-9-AGENDA

You can listen live on the Radical Agendas Radio Network. Catch video on demand on our Bitchute channel!

The players on this site now have 24/7/365 streaming content!

You can always listen to live Radical Agenda episodes at

https://ChristopherCantwell.com/live

 

This production is made possible by the financial support of listeners and readers like you. I literally cannot do this without you. I sell shirts, hats, mousepads, and other cool stuff, though sadly, we can only accept cryptocurrency. Or you can just fork over money by donating.

Shop At EdgyGoodies.com!

 

 

 

 

 

 

Podcast: Play in new window | Download

Subscribe: Android | RSS

This weekend brought us some excellent news. The President of the United States is not an agent of the Russian Government, as had been portrayed as fact since prior to his election, by the Left.

You already know this of course, because you have a three digit IQ, and are interested in the truth.

This is sadly not the case for a startling number of our fellow registered voters, and the con artists they elect. Democrats just cannot leave well enough alone or accept defeat under any circumstances, and have thus pledged to continue pursuing this obvious scam for as long as they are not physically prevented from doing so. Their cooperative allies in the Jewish press are of course wholly supportive of continuing this lie, and if this pursuit destroys every institution in the country, all the better, so far as any of them are concerned.

It has been amusing to watch the conservative media erupt in celebration over this. They act as if this was actually about Russian collusion, and feign amazement that Mueller’s report has not silenced the president’s foes. Host after host, and guest after guest, scratch their heads wondering why Democrats aren’t happy to hear that the President is above board. They act like this is all some kind of honest disagreement that ought to be settled by a thorough investigation.

We know better. For the Left, this was never about Trump being the puppet of a foreign power. If anybody cared one bit about foreign influence in our government, his lauding praise upon the Jewish State would be what raised their eyebrows, and the commentary of Ilhan Omar, visa vis Israel, would have been wholly unremarkable. The Left hates Trump because he called attention to the immigration crisis, and for this he must be destroyed, along with anybody who might lend him aid and comfort. If they can collude with a foreign power to accomplish this, they will, as evidenced by the Clinton campaign doing exactly this, before the election.

This continued push to paint the President as a criminal and enemy of the country is no mere failure to comprehend the facts, though given the ineptitude of some involved, it would be easy to believe this. What the President and others have referred to as “fake news” has descended beyond mere bad reporting, and into full blown war propaganda. Trump’s supposed allegiance to foreign powers is on par with the fervor over weapons of mass destruction in Iraq, before that foreign policy disaster set us down this path over a decade and a half ago. The abundance of evidence in contravention of the narrative, cannot be permitted to interfere with the prime objective. Namely, forcible regime change.

They can do this of course, because they are playing a completely different game than the Republicans. The Left just keeps on throwing out more and more nonsense, while conservatives scramble to get their facts straight and present coherent arguments in response. Before they are even done responding, the next onslaught of incoherent accusations, policy proposals, fake news, and war propaganda have flooded the discourse, and their responses go almost completely unnoticed. This is because reason and evidence were never part of the rules of engagement for the Left. Instead of participating in a debate, the Left is just screaming for ethnic warfare, and calling in reinforcements to their side by hindering immigration enforcement.

What is even more troubling is that things ought to be moving in the exact opposite direction. Were the news to break that no evidence of collusion had been forthcoming, and we all just let this unfortunate episode fade from memory, I would still be enraged. The Left has effectively stolen a presidency by handcuffing the President with this scam investigation for the last two years. One could argue it costed the Republicans control of the House in the midterms. A great deal of value was stolen and destroyed by this deception, and people should be going to prison for setting this fraud in motion. Lisa Page, Peter Strzok, James Comey, Andrew McCabe, Rod Rosenstein, and others committed numerous crimes during the course of this. If they did not do so at Clinton’s behest, they at least did so for her benefit, and by the standard of the Russian investigation, that is probable cause for collusion. When will her lawyers’ cell phones traced with a triggerfish device? When will their offices be raided, and their documents seized? When will she be threatened with obstruction charges over every criticism of the investigation?

I suspect such justice will be about as quick to come to fruition as our big beautiful wall. If they were serious about it, Trump would at least be suing the Clinton campaign and Christopher Steele for defamation, one would think. This of course is the asymmetrical warfare that has been waged against us for as long as I’ve been paying attention to politics. The Left is perpetually in attack mode, and Republicans are eternally playing defense. The Left gains ground at our expense, and the best we can ever seem to hope for is to stay standing until the bell rings.

Unless something unexpected happens, America is racing toward cataclysm. Either the Left will succeed in turning enough of Trump’s base against him, and riling up enough non white voters, to win the upcoming election, or they will continue to use whatever powers are at their disposal to make it impossible for him to govern. Even absent that pressure, there is ample reason to doubt Trump would do anything meaningful to stop what’s coming. In any case, our institutions will be destroyed, and I remind those who cheer for that outcome that our side has no structure ready to replace them. The mainstream right is cucked and terrified. Those of us to their Right, are at each other’s throats, inundated with crooks and liars, and incapable of holding so much as a permitted demonstration. The idea that order would break down, and we would somehow take power in the chaos is too ridiculous to take seriously.

It could be fixed if Republicans would act.

• Prosecute the crooks who launched this bogus investigation, and everyone who lied under oath during its course.
• Find and prosecute what are surely countless campaign finance violations committed by the Clinton campaign/foundation.
• Prosecute every news outlet and social media site that gave in kind contributions to Democrats though censorship and defamation of the Right.
• Sue the social media and payment processing companies for anti-trust violations over anti-competitive behavior toward Gab, PewTube, BitChute, Hatreon, and others.
• Prosecute Christine Blasey Ford, and Julie Swetnik for lying under oath about Brett Kavanaugh.
• Prosecute every Leftist aggressor, perjurer, and corrupt public official in Charlottesville.
• Send the National Guard in to stop Antifa and BLM riots.
• Send the FBI after Left wing activists who organize and encourage this mayhem, and slap them with terrorism and rioting charges.

That very short list of very reasonable actions would dramatically alter the course of the country. Leftists are a lot of things, but they are not brave. If they met actual consequences for their crimes, they would be less apt to commit them. Things are spiraling out of control, not so much because our laws are inadequate, though they are quite inadequate. The reason we find ourselves on the brink of unspeakable chaos is because the laws are not being enforced. Leftists act like perjury and riot are legal, and you can understand why they would come to that conclusion given recent events.

I predict we’ll be promised all this and more leading up to the election. “Vote Republican one more time! Give us the power we need and we’ll finally wield it to your benefit!”

I can understand why some people are getting sick of that routine. I sure am.

 

Join us this and every Monday, and Friday from 5-7pm Eastern, for another exciting episode of the Radical Agenda. It’s a show about timeless ideas, the news of the day, and whatever is on your mind at  323-9-AGENDA

You can listen live on the Radical Agendas Radio Network. Catch video on demand on our Bitchute channel!

The players on this site now have 24/7/365 streaming content!

You can always listen to live Radical Agenda episodes at

https://ChristopherCantwell.com/live

 

This production is made possible by the financial support of listeners and readers like you. I literally cannot do this without you. I sell shirts, hats, mousepads, and other cool stuff, though sadly, we can only accept cryptocurrency. Or you can just fork over money by donating.

Shop At EdgyGoodies.com!

 

 

 

 

 

Podcast: Play in new window | Download

Subscribe: Android | RSS

There has long been some buzz about the “insidious libertarian to alt right pipeline” as Matt Lewis at the Daily Beast referred to it. Well prior to this of course, Leftists have relentlessly assailed libertarians as racists, for reasons which might charitably be described as varying in merit. I’ve touched on the subject a few times myself, writing “Libertarians and the Alt Right” in March of 2017, and later that year elaborating more on my own personal journey in a piece titled “Why I Consider Myself Alt Right” that August.

That seems like forever ago to me. I hardly even hear the word libertarian these days, and if I never hear it again, it will be too soon. While the true thought leaders of the libertarian movement have contributed a great deal to my thinking, that movement as it stands today is worse than useless. It frustrates me tremendously to see so many White men of intellect, talent, and good character, exert so much effort toward something that, regardless of what they might debate the “true” underlying message to be, functionally serves to promote a moral standard which cannot perpetuate itself.

Indeed, libertarianism can only be discussed in polite society today, because the remaining specs of authoritarianism in what passes for the Right these days, keep the Left just ever so slightly uncertain of their hegemony. Were it not for that fear, the libertarians would be treated just as badly as us so called “Nazis,” who it has become socially and legally acceptable to assault in broad daylight on camera in public.

Libertarians dutifully bow to the same Leftists who will later devour them in our absence, of course. Foolishly hoping they’ll be spared, and showing all the time preference of a goldfish, they eagerly renounce the wickedness of certain categories of information, assuring all who will listen that they would never attempt to understand such an immoral body of facts and evidence. In rare, but noteworthy instances, they’ll find the courage to refrain from outright attacks on science, and deploy more clever diversionary tactics to distance themselves from those whom the power structure will not tolerate.

It is during such displays when people like me become “former libertarians,” and enter the dreaded pipeline.

I do maintain a subscription to the email list of one noteworthy libertarian content producer, who on most days manages to earn my admiration. Unlike most of my email subscriptions, I even read the stuff he puts out. I won’t put him through the discomfort of making the search engines further associate our names, but those in the know will connect the dots, and those not in the know still ought to be able to appreciate the thrust of what I will attempt to illustrate here.

As has been known to happen from time to time, this subject of my admiration came under fire for some social media commentary that was deemed “racist” by people who oddly enough seem to feel that way about nearly everything. Fortunately for our totally not racist libertarian friend, he was merely quoting Thomas Sowell, a black economist whom we are frequently reminded is held in high regard by all decent people, amongst whom he surely counts himself, thereby obliterating the absurd notion that he hates all black people for nothing other than the color of their skin.

“Ah ha! Your move, commie!”

Of course, this strawman caricature of a racist is just something Leftists use to malign their political opponents, and cowards on the Right use to distance themselves from the truth. I am here telling you that I am a racist by any contemporary definition. I’ll take it further than that even, I am an avowed, and internationally famous White Nationalist. I don’t even care if people call me a Nazi, and I don’t view the world in this way either. Being a racist in 2019 simply means you are smart enough to understand, and honest enough to discuss, the indisputable fact that there are genetic differences between racial groups. It is the recognition of the obvious fact, that those differences often present themselves in socially valued categories, such as intelligence, and that this information is worthy of attention when discussing public policy as pertains to demographic disparities.

Here is a brief crash course in Race Realism 101. If you’re a politically interested person over 25 years of age and you don’t know this yet, you should curse out your favorite political influencer for not filling you in on this sooner. It is nothing short of criminal that this isn’t common knowledge.

• Blacks on average have lower IQs than do Whites, with Whites averaging 100 and blacks a standard deviation behind at 85. No honest and informed person disputes this fact.
• Your IQ is not something which you expand by reading books. It is not a measurement of your knowledge or your education. It is a measurement of the cognitive capacity, or, to borrow a computing term, processing power, of one’s brain.
• The brain is a bodily organ not unlike any other, and as such its characteristics are passed down to us through the DNA of our parents.
• Groups of people who evolved separately from one another for thousands of years, in different climatic conditions, sharing different gene pools, meeting different survival requirements, and forming different cultures, instincts, and habits to meet them, developed common characteristics amongst their respective groups, and these may provide advantages or disadvantages when entering into various forms of competition with other racial groups. It is not a coincidence that blacks dominate professional sports, as the most obvious example.
• Debate rages on about “nature vs. nurture,” but this is almost entirely a political argument. Honest and informed people know that, while environment can certainly damage and destroy an otherwise impressive genetic specimen, all animals, including humans, are born with a certain degree of genetic potential, beyond which no environmental factor can improve.
• IQ is the single most reliable predictor of success in a market economy.
• Criminal behavior peaks, across racial lines, in individuals with IQ scores ranging between 80 and 90.

Once you understand these facts, it makes perfect sense to say that the black to White IQ disparity is genetic in its origins. This genetic predisposition explains all manner of other social inequities which emerge along racial lines, such as poverty, crime, and out of wedlock births. It also completely destroys the Leftist (Jewish) narrative that White racism is the only cause of human suffering in the world, and removes all the justifications for programs such as affirmative action and the renewed push for reparations. No change in public policy, and no amount of money, will ever make blacks rise to the level of Whites. The best the egalitarians can hope to accomplish, is to so damage Whites as to bring them down to the level of blacks, and that is precisely what they are trying to do.

Like every reader with Right of center political views, I think Thomas Sowell has made some valuable contributions to our political discourse, but it’s no coincidence that he or Walter Williams always come up whenever someone who is (understandably) terrified of being branded a racist, feels compelled to address a story with racial undertones. These men are the exceptions that happen to prove the rule. Democrats rely on black votes to obtain power because blacks are stupid enough to believe their lies, and the fact that every conservative cites the same two black economists when trying to dispell this “free markets are racist goy” meme, only proves the point. Of all the blacks in the United States, and all the resources Republicans and libertarians have squandered on trying to educate them, we have Walter Williams, Thomas Sowell, and arguably Candace Owens, to show for it. This is retarded, it’s a waste of money and time, and it will never improve.  The Democrats know this, which is why they are always trying to force diversity initiatives on everybody. The less White a place or group is, the less resistance there is to Leftist hegemony.

Recall the commandment of America’s moral compass, Saint Alexandria Ocasio Cortez, “Tokenism is racism”. She’s an idiot, a liar, and most notably, a Jew, but in this respect, she’s correct.

With all of this understood, let us address the subject matter of the email which inspired this tirade.

Our libertarian friend was addressing an issue of school funding, and rightly raised doubts about the merits of increased educational funding for blacks. He and others know, that money will not cause blacks to perform better in school, and the perpetual leftist demand for additional resources based on the lie that it will, has to be answered this way if budgets are ever to be restored to sanity.

Surely aware of the consequences that would come with answering the question, he asks why poor Asians score higher on standardized tests than more affluent blacks.

The answer of course, is genetics. Asians have higher IQs on average than do Whites, and Whites, as we’ve already established, score higher than blacks. Thus Asians do better in school, even when provided with less resources than the Jew’s negro pets.

Since Leftists are as well aware of this obvious fact as any Nazi, they descended upon our libertarian friend to call him a “white supremacist”. Surely having seen what the Jews do to “white supremacists,” our libertarian friend felt compelled to defend himself against the claim.

Surely, quoting a black economist to discuss the superior performance of Asians could not be White Supremacy. Right?

Even as a famous racist, I’ve never called myself a White Supremacist, as that conjures in the mind an image of Whites ruling over non-Whites. This was tried (slavery), and in my view, it caused a lot more problems for Whites than it did for blacks. Imagine how much better America would be today, had it not been for the importation of Africans during that period of our history.

(Side note: Wouldn’t it be fun if all these Leftists looked into the disproportionate representation of Jews in slave ownership and the slave trade?)

Of course, that isn’t what the Left means by White Supremacy.

Our libertarian friend goes on to say “I know of precisely zero people who favor laws that would give whites “supremacy” over other races.”

Of course, that isn’t what the Left means by White Supremacy, either. In any case, he is incorrect about this, and not just because he’s spoken to me before.

Literally every libertarian believes in exactly this, which is why all the “left libertarians” are nothing but closet communists trying to destroy all that is decent and holy. Our friend is smart enough to realize who would end up in charge, if markets were as libertarians imagine they ought to be. Hint, it ain’t blacks. Sure, that’s not an explicitly racial policy, but it has a decidedly racial outcome, and that’s what matters to people who view the world in racial terms. In this, I include both myself, and the Left wing nuts he was referencing.

The sort of ordered liberty which has defined Western Civilization, is literally White Supremacy from this perspective. If everyone is entitled only to what they are able to earn in the market, whites will, as a group, outcompete blacks pretty reliably. If we own all the property, they are under our control, and the fact that there is a libertarian moral perspective to justify this matters not to racial egalitarians, because they are not libertarians, no matter what lies they espouse on Facebook. Absent the welfare State, this obviously impacts birthrates in a manner which favors Whites, allowing us to not only dominate them economically, but sexually, reproductively, and democratically as well.

So it shouldn’t surprise us that blacks and their advocates are hostile to this type of order. It is not in their best interests as a race. Without quarreling over definitions too much, you can see how the outcome of this, from a genetic perspective, is scarcely different from that of a genocide. If we outcompete them economically and they are unable to reproduce themselves, or we outcompete them martially and there are none left to reproduce, the outcome is the same in that they cease to exist as a race.

Now, if you’re a semi-literate person you might be saying to yourself “But Chris, it is White people who aren’t reproducing themselves these days. Are you saying Whites are being genocided?”

As a matter of fact, that’s exactly what I’m saying, though not due to an abundance of economic liberty. More on that later…

In America, and in libertarian circles in particular, there has been a tremendous effort to just not see things in these terms. We have been told our entire lives that race is not to be considered. On what passes for the Right today, this has been largely implemented. Whether the colorblindness is genuine or just a convincing fraud is up for some debate, but for all the screams of the Left, you just do not see people in the mainstream Right making explicitly racial appeals. Anyone on the Right who does this is destroyed by the media and the financial system which, I should note, are dominated by Jews.

Interestingly, these consequences are not visited upon the Left for doing exactly this. The Left isn’t just adding identity politics to their agenda, they are abandoning the very concept of having ideas, and instead fomenting race war through the political process. This is why Alexandria Ocasio Cortez doesn’t care about being factually accurate. As far as she and the rest of the Left is concerned, the very concept of objective reality is a relic of White Supremacy to be defeated.

How does one defeat “White Supremacy?” Well, by doing away with White people, of course. By flooding their countries with immigrants, making it impossible for them to advocate for their interests, demeaning them in media and pop culture, redistributing their resources to other racial groups, prohibiting them from discriminating, telling them to sterilize their daughters, and murder their children, convincing them to become homosexuals or change their gender before puberty, and keeping a running tally of their declining percentage of the population, looking gleefully toward the day when they will have no political power anywhere in the world.

Because to the Left, White Supremacy is not a system or an ideology. It is not a set of laws. It is not the caricature of a belligerent redneck blinded by his hatred of “the other”. Those are all Jewish lies designed to make Whites oppose anyone who would dare to advocate for their interests and survival. To the Left, White Supremacy is inherent to the existence of White people, as evidenced by our domination of the world throughout so much of its history. It does not matter to them that we have abandoned our expansionist designs, or that we have given up any sense of racial identity for ourselves. So long as we exist in sufficient numbers to act politically, we are a threat to their designs. Until we are so diminished that we can never again assert ourselves, they will continue to attack us in every imaginable way, and there is good reason to doubt they will even stop once we are so diminished.

Until libertarians recognize this reality, and act on it, they are worse than useless. Some of the most capable and intelligent and morally upstanding White men who ever existed, exert all of their efforts toward an ideology which ignores an imminent and lethal threat to their very survival. There will be no libertarianism in the absence of White people, which is why people who hate liberty keep on telling libertarians to purge “racists” from their movement.

Well, let us hope that they do, and fast. For every libertarian who gets branded a Nazi and chased from that worthless circle jerk, we get a new recruit. For me, and a lot of other former libertarians, it finally just made more sense to let the communists have the name, and move onto something with actual teeth. If freedom means open borders, ignorance of biology, infanticide, drug addiction, and sexual degeneracy, then count me amongst the authoritarians. Because what the libertarian movement has proven more than anything, is that most people are just plain unfit to govern themselves.

Join us this and every Monday, and Friday from 5-7pm Eastern, for another exciting episode of the Radical Agenda. It’s a show about timeless ideas, the news of the day, and whatever is on your mind at  323-9-AGENDA

You can listen live on the Radical Agendas Radio Network. Catch video on demand on our Bitchute channel!

 

The players on this site now have 24/7/365 streaming content!

You can always listen to live Radical Agenda episodes at

https://ChristopherCantwell.com/live

 

This production is made possible by the financial support of listeners and readers like you. I literally cannot do this without you. I sell shirts, hats, mousepads, and other cool stuff, though sadly, we can only accept cryptocurrency. Or you can just fork over money by donating.

Shop At EdgyGoodies.com!

 

 

 

 

Podcast: Play in new window | Download

Subscribe: Android | RSS